<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Baltimore&#8217;s billion-bucks transit shopping spree: how not to blow&#160;it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/</link>
	<description>Stirring Up Baltimore News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 03:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: geraldneily</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>geraldneily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 17:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimorebrew.com/publish/?p=2408#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>So, Some Guy, I take it that you&#039;re not quarreling with the quality of my proposals, only that The Brew is not the place or time for them. I&#039;ve made similar proposals going all the way back to when I was the MTA liaison at the Baltimore City Planning Department in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s.

But the MTA needs fresh ideas now more than ever. Out of over 600 respondants to the Red Line Draft Environmental Impact Statement, less than ten of us (including me) expressed support for the MTA&#039;s only rail alternative which meets federal effectiveness standards - the all surface plan. Everyone else who expressed a preference (including the City government) wants the MTA to submit a plan which the feds would need to reject for policy violation. The Red Line&#039;s best &quot;friends&quot; could easily be the ones who kill the project.

Four of the five ideas I&#039;ve presented here are intended to make the MTA&#039;s all-surface alternative more palatable to all the groups that have rejected them. They could also be adopted during the preliminary engineering phase, although traditionally, that is when plans are usually cheapened up, not improved.

The fifth idea to tunnel into Leakin Park addresses the West Baltimore community which has demonstrated the strongest opposition to the Red Line. This is a modification of a plan that the Transit Riders Action Council (of which I am not a member) has been pushing tirelessly throughout the various Red Line meetings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Some Guy, I take it that you&#8217;re not quarreling with the quality of my proposals, only that The Brew is not the place or time for them. I&#8217;ve made similar proposals going all the way back to when I was the MTA liaison at the Baltimore City Planning Department in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s.</p>
<p>But the MTA needs fresh ideas now more than ever. Out of over 600 respondants to the Red Line Draft Environmental Impact Statement, less than ten of us (including me) expressed support for the MTA&#8217;s only rail alternative which meets federal effectiveness standards &#8211; the all surface plan. Everyone else who expressed a preference (including the City government) wants the MTA to submit a plan which the feds would need to reject for policy violation. The Red Line&#8217;s best &#8220;friends&#8221; could easily be the ones who kill the project.</p>
<p>Four of the five ideas I&#8217;ve presented here are intended to make the MTA&#8217;s all-surface alternative more palatable to all the groups that have rejected them. They could also be adopted during the preliminary engineering phase, although traditionally, that is when plans are usually cheapened up, not improved.</p>
<p>The fifth idea to tunnel into Leakin Park addresses the West Baltimore community which has demonstrated the strongest opposition to the Red Line. This is a modification of a plan that the Transit Riders Action Council (of which I am not a member) has been pushing tirelessly throughout the various Red Line meetings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Some  Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1180</link>
		<dc:creator>Some  Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimorebrew.com/publish/?p=2408#comment-1180</guid>
		<description>When did you make these plans known to the many public meetings that have been held on this subject? Because if you didn&#039;t you&#039;re just jerking off in public, which isn&#039;t usually considered attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did you make these plans known to the many public meetings that have been held on this subject? Because if you didn&#8217;t you&#8217;re just jerking off in public, which isn&#8217;t usually considered attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerald Neily</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1142</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerald Neily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimorebrew.com/publish/?p=2408#comment-1142</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the kind words, Larry, and time to &#039;fess up: Yes, I live almost exactly six blocks north of the northernmost Red Line alternative on (or under) Eastern Avenue. But Baltimore is a small town. We&#039;re all more or less NIMBYs - guinea pigs in this urban laboratory. That&#039;s why I wrote about five things we SHOULD do in our backyards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the kind words, Larry, and time to &#8216;fess up: Yes, I live almost exactly six blocks north of the northernmost Red Line alternative on (or under) Eastern Avenue. But Baltimore is a small town. We&#8217;re all more or less NIMBYs &#8211; guinea pigs in this urban laboratory. That&#8217;s why I wrote about five things we SHOULD do in our backyards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Moon</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/05/22/if-you-had-a-billion-bucks-or-two-for-transit-how-would-you-use-it-to-make-baltimore-better/comment-page-1/#comment-1131</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Moon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimorebrew.com/publish/?p=2408#comment-1131</guid>
		<description>Gerald --

Nice piece. A lot of good stuff here. One suggestion for future pieces: Fully disclose early on that you live in the neighborhood (about six blocks from the proposed line, if I&#039;m to believe your Anywho record). Otherwise, this could come off as NIMBYism in sheep&#039;s clothing, which I&#039;m sure was not the intention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerald &#8211;</p>
<p>Nice piece. A lot of good stuff here. One suggestion for future pieces: Fully disclose early on that you live in the neighborhood (about six blocks from the proposed line, if I&#8217;m to believe your Anywho record). Otherwise, this could come off as NIMBYism in sheep&#8217;s clothing, which I&#8217;m sure was not the intention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 335/360 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.baltimorebrew.com @ 2012-02-08 22:25:34 -->
