<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The state rests &#8211; but technology doesn&#8217;t &#8211; news liveblogged from the Dixon&#160;trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/11/17/the-state-rests-but-technology-doesnt-news-liveblogged-from-the-dixon-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/11/17/the-state-rests-but-technology-doesnt-news-liveblogged-from-the-dixon-trial/</link>
	<description>Stirring Up Baltimore News and Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 02:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMerkle</title>
		<link>http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2009/11/17/the-state-rests-but-technology-doesnt-news-liveblogged-from-the-dixon-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMerkle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baltimorebrew.com/publish/?p=6244#comment-6918</guid>
		<description>The 2 charges that were thrown out has some merit. It may not have been what the public wanted, but no matter how damaging the testimony may have been to Dixon, it still would have gone her way. Lipscomb may have had the dirt, but it would have been turning the spotlight off of Dixon. Lipscomb has already had his day in court. This is Dixon&#039;s trial and the finger still needs to be pointed at Dixon. Lipscomb&#039;s testimony would have discredited him and his company and not necessarily done the amount of damage to Dixon that would have been expected. The cliche here is not what would have been the lesser of two evils but what would have been the greater of the two evils remembering that this is Dixon&#039;s trial.

BTW. thank the gods for tweeting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2 charges that were thrown out has some merit. It may not have been what the public wanted, but no matter how damaging the testimony may have been to Dixon, it still would have gone her way. Lipscomb may have had the dirt, but it would have been turning the spotlight off of Dixon. Lipscomb has already had his day in court. This is Dixon&#8217;s trial and the finger still needs to be pointed at Dixon. Lipscomb&#8217;s testimony would have discredited him and his company and not necessarily done the amount of damage to Dixon that would have been expected. The cliche here is not what would have been the lesser of two evils but what would have been the greater of the two evils remembering that this is Dixon&#8217;s trial.</p>
<p>BTW. thank the gods for tweeting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/8 queries in 0.035 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 254/259 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.baltimorebrew.com @ 2012-05-21 03:20:01 -->
