Feedback

Five fixes to make the Lowe’s redevelopment work for Remington

  • Story Link
  • 4

Categories

West side, Lowe's project, current layout.

West side, Lowe's project, current layout.

by GERALD NEILY

The city’s relationship to Howard and 25th Street was largely defined long ago by the fate of two bridges, one built and the other dismantled.

Busy Howard Street was once quiet Oak Street, until a large bridge was built over the Jones Falls Valley, making Howard the city’s most automobile-oriented route out of downtown. Some years later, the high trestle bridge that was a northwest extension of 25th Street was dismantled. (This bridge carried streetcars on Huntingdon Avenue over the Stoney Run Valley to Hampden and its destruction was part of the city-wide dismantling of the streetcar system.) The elimination of this bridge turned busy Huntingdon Avenue into a dead end, and took much of 25th Street’s identity with it.

The currently-proposed Lowe’s shopping complex is the biggest development to shape the identity of Howard and 25th Street since the fate of those two bridges was sealed. Will it become just another auto-oriented fortress along Howard Street, or will it revive 25th Street to its former urban prominence? This is really the core question.

Lowes project ,suggested changes in yellow.

Lowes project, suggested changes in yellow.

In its earlier incarnation, 25th Street was a classic urban shopping street, but now it could benefit greatly from an infusion of energy from this new development: provided it can be assimilated into its urban environment. So, the key to making the Lowe’s development work is to give it a strong urban face along 25th Street and thus make it the anchor of its struggling commercial district.

The site geography is actually very conducive to making this work, the greatest portion of which is in a large gully beyond the west end of 25th Street. This is where the Lowe’s and the supermarket are proposed, along with the vast majority of the parking in a multi-level structure built into the gully, mostly hidden by the CSX railroad tracks and a large industrial warehouse now being renovated into a storage facility.

Here are the possible strategies that could make this work:

1 – Make the site entrance at the west end of 25th Street look and feel like an extension of 25th Street. This can be done by using street-quality curbs, sidewalks and crosswalks into the site. The bend of 25th Street into Huntingdon Avenue could also be treated to give Huntingdon its own identity as a separate residential street and a gateway to the Remington community, perhaps with a landscaped median and a neighborhood welcome sign.

2 – Extend the buildings in the Lowe’s development all the way to the sidewalk edges at this 25th Street site entrance, at the west side of Howard Street, and at the south end of Huntingdon Avenue (shown in orange on the sketch above). This will give the Lowe’s complex far greater visibility at the end of the bend between 25th and Huntingdon, instead of being hidden away in the gully, and allow it to serve as an “anchor” for the west end of the 25th Street shopping district. These new buildings can be situated so that they are most accessible from the middle parking level, distributing parking usage most efficiently, since the Lowe’s and the supermarket will likely draw parkers predominately to the top and bottom parking levels.

3 – Reduce the retail intensity on the east side of Howard Street. This becomes feasible by increasing the retail intensity on the west side of Howard, as described above. At the very least, the truck loading dock that would disrupt quiet 24th Street between Howard and Maryland Avenue should be eliminated. At most, the parking deck east of Howard can also be eliminated, which will allow for a much more pedestrian-friendly and street oriented plan.

4 – Provide all development on 25th Street and Maryland Avenue with entrances directly from the street sidewalks. 25th Street should have retail frontage along the entire block face between Howard to Maryland, to reinforce it as an urban shopping street. Maryland Avenue should have residences which all front directly onto the street sidewalk. Driveways from both streets to provide access to rear parking would be fine, and these driveways would be excellent locations for corner building doors that can be made visible and active from both the street and the parking lot.

Stone church at 24th and Sisson

Stone church at 24th and Sisson. Photo by John Dean.

5 – Save the stone church building at 24th and Sisson Streets. This gracious, irreplaceable old building is the perfect transition between the hulking new development and the adjacent neighborhood south of 24th Street, which features small-scaled houses. It could also become an identifying landmark for the retail complex, enabling potential non-local customers to associate it with Sisson Street, which provides the easiest and best access to the site from the Jones Falls Expressway via 28th Street.

- Regular Brew contributor Gerald Neily was a Baltimore City transportation planner.

  • http://www.griaonline.org Chris

    Gerry,

    These suggestions are all right on target! I’ll be spreading this around.

  • Craig B

    Please, please don’t make that random non-church an icon. It’s old, sure. With a lot of work, it could be pretty. But it isn’t unusual, it isn’t historical, and it isn’t even a church. It’s been an industrial storage lot for most of the century. If people wanted to “save” it, they could have done something about it in the 100 years since the congregation left. This development, getting it right in particular, is far to too important to trivialize it with an emotional quest to save an old building of dubious historical value.

  • Fritz

    Craig B, it’s not about historical value, it’s about the feel of the landscape such a place creates. It’s about varying the styles of the area rather than making the whole thing a new block of development you incorporate some of the old.

    I hope they manage to create an urban feel for the area. They should not neglect Howard St. for on the street storefronts. Some more housing might be nicer since I doubt there is demand for that much retail.

  • http://coroflot.com/mmiller Mark

    Definitely good suggestions.

    As far as that building goes I can agree with both sides of the argument. It’s a nice looking building,except for the obvious addition, and would provide some nice visual transition. It could even inform some of the styling for the new buildings. But a nice looking building without a purpose is just another vacant building. We can’t have a street that is made of nice looking buildings with no purpose. If someone can come up with a good purpose for it and do away with that ugly addition then by all means keep it. Otherwise, scrap it.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • January 27, 2012

    • Catching up on a slew of interesting things to do and read this weekend that we almost lost track of in the Kickstarter hub-bub. Here are just a few: SATURDAY (1/28/12) New Mercury Non-fiction Reading – Check out tell-it-like-it-is education blogger Edit Barry (see below) and a pack of other feisty non-fictional characters from the [...]

Twitter

Facebook