Feedback

Developer still seeks to knock down historic "Superblock" buildings on Baltimore’s decaying west side

  • Story Link
  • 18

Categories

Developers want to demolish the Art Deco McCrory's Building. (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

story by JOAN JACOBSON, photos by ELIZABETH SUMAN

Some of the finest examples of historic preservation in Baltimore are on the rickety west side of downtown, right where the city may need them most.

There’s the ornate, wedding-white Stewarts Department store (now Catholic Relief Services headquarters), the flagship Hecht Company building on Howard Street and the regal, neoclassical BG&E building on Lexington Street (now both luxury apartments). Then there’s the Hippodrome Theatre on North Eutaw Street, that masterpiece of urban rejuvenation.

But just steps away, local preservationists are frustrated by what they see: one square block of empty, largely historic buildings, waiting for a city-designated developer who wants to destroy many of them to build modern retail buildings. Among the threatened buildings are some great examples of Art Deco architecture and some even older buildings — structures that survived the Baltimore fire of 1904.

McCrory's tilework detail. (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

For five years, an out-of-town developer, calling itself Lexington Square Partners, has submitted plans that call for bulldozing most of the buildings along the south side of the 200 block of W. Lexington Street, as well as the blocks of Howard Street, Park Avenue and Fayette Street that adjoin it, known as the Superblock.

It wasn’t supposed to happen this way.

((Inside: our research-rich SUPERBLOCK SLIDESHOW))



-

Decade-old agreement

The National Trust for Historic Preservation has called downtown’s west side one of the America’s 11 most endangered historic places. That’s why preservationists were thrilled in 2001 with a remarkable memorandum of agreement consenting to protect most of the buildings. It was signed by then Mayor Martin O’Malley and J. Rodney Little, director of the Maryland Historical Trust, whose agency must sign off on development plans before the bulldozers take over.

Preservationists thought the agreement was a novel way to preserve the buildings without going through the cumbersome process of landmarks protection from the city’s Commission on Historic and Architectural Preservation.

But all was not well when the city’s development arm – the Baltimore Development Corporation – chose a consortium of developers who have yet to follow the memorandum of agreement in their plans to convert the block for retail stores. Five years have gone by without an agreement that passes muster with the state historic trust. Meanwhile, the vacant buildings have languished behind chain link fences.

The Cast-Iron McCrory's Building. (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

 A year ago, Little sent an exasperated letter to BDC’s director, M. Jay Brodie, noting that the latest plans did not meet even the minimum requirements of the memorandum of agreement.

Here are a few architectural details that might be lost from these buildings that the Lexington Square Partners is hoping to destroy:

* The pretty and intricate inlaid yellow and blue tile designs on the Art Deco McCory’s building on Lexington Street.
* The gold eagles below the roof line of the ornate, terra cotta Schulte United Five and Dime Store, also on Lexington Street.
* The terra cotta sailing ship panels on the façade of Read’s flagship drugstore and the weathered copper mast spouting at the building’s corner of Lexington and Howard Streets.
* The last little Nickelodeon Theater, once known as the Pickwick Theater on Howard street across from the Hecht Company building.

Developer wants to demolish this little 102-year-old theater on Howard Street. (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

Preservationists fear the worst

As executive director of the nonprofit WestSide Renaissance Inc., Ron Kreitner watches over the stalled Superblock development like a worried father. His frustration mirrors that of others hoping to preserve the area’s historic urban character, while rebuilding the old retail district.

 He points to proven historic tax credits used by other developers as a way to affordably develop the area and keep the old buildings intact. And he worries that the city, through the BDC, has abandoned its mission to preserve the Superblock, which is listed on the Maryland Register of Historic Properties and the National Register of Historic Places.

“I think that BDC has failed to grasp the significance of historic preservation for the west side,” Kreitner said. “Beyond that, it’s anybody’s guess as to why they stuck with what was viewed early on as a flawed proposal.”

Deco detail: sailing ship on Read's drug store (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

Johns Hopkins is executive director of Baltimore Heritage, the city’s private preservation watchdog that has many Superblock buildings on its ‘watch list.’

“It’s a disservice to choose a developer clearly not interested in preserving” the buildings, Hopkins said.

Hopkins asked the city last fall to end its relationship with the Lexington Square development team, but said he hasn’t heard back from city officials.

Bailey Pope, Vice President of design and construction for the Dawson Company of Atlanta (one of Lexington Square’s partners) declined to comment:

“I don’t think I want to discuss that in the press right now. We’re having discussions and I don’t want to taint it by debating it in public,” he said.

Wiggle room for the developer

Despite the clamor to get rid of the developer and start over, BDC’s director, M. Jay Brodie, defends his agency’s decision to stick with the Lexington Square team and says negotiations continue with the state to live up to the memorandum of agreement.

Brodie also, however, notes that the developers are trying to juggle preservation goals with the feasibility of creating 150,000 square feet of open retail space that will be inviting to consumers.

“We respect the memorandum of agreement; the mayor signed it,” said Brodie. But he added a caveat: “It’s somewhat like the bible. There is more than one interpretation.” For example, he noted that the agreement requires priority be given to preserving entire buildings – not just facades – “when economically and technically feasible.”

Gold eagles on the Schulte United Five and Dime Store (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

The agreement contains one list of five properties that must be saved. (Though the developer’s last plan called for saving only the facades of three of them, plus the other two in their entirety.)

A second list contains more than a dozen properties that should be preserved with “reasonable effort.” (In that category, the latest plans showed the preservation of only two buildings, one at the corner of Park and Lexington Streets that was the large Art Deco Brager-Gutman department store.)

Beyond repair?

Brodie said the developer cannot save the flagship Read’s drug store at the opposite end of the block (at Howard and Lexington) because it is badly water-damaged and infected with moss and mildew.

He said they are still negotiating the fate of several other historic buildings on Lexington Street.

“We’ve come a very long way with the Maryland Historical Trust. Whether we can have absolute consensus, we don’t know, but everybody is trying,” said Brodie.

What further complicates the stalled project is a decision being awaited from the Maryland Court of Appeals that could overturn BDC’s award of the project to the Lexington Square partners.

Preservationists and a councilmember protest

The city’s insistence on keeping the Lexington Square development team, despite the five years that have elapsed, has prompted a collective teeth gnashing reflected in protest letters from the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Westside Renaissance Baltimore Heritage and the Baltimore Chapter of the American Institute of Architects, which implored (then) Mayor Sheila Dixon to live up to the city’s agreement to save the buildings.

“There is nothing greener than the recycling of old, viable buildings,” wrote Alan Brock, AIA’s president-elect and Karen Lewand, executive director last October.

But perhaps one of the strongest letters of protest came last September from City Council member William H. Cole IV, whose district includes downtown. He bluntly asked Brodie to “terminate the Superblock partnership with Lexington Square Partners LLC.”

West side Baltimore downtown. (Google maps.)

Cole, in an interview with The Brew, said Brodie subsequently met with him and “insisted and guaranteed … that BDC would not allow the developer to tear down any historic properties and stick to the memorandum.” Brodie promised, said Cole that, “No building would come down without full approval from Maryland Historical Trust.”

Since then, though, Cole has seen no revised plans and wonders whether it might not be such a bad idea (despite Brodie’s promises) to go out and find a new developer.

“I’m still wondering if five years isn’t too long and have a fresh set of eyes look at property and put it out to bid,” he said.

“I don’t want to wake up one morning and find three buildings on that block were accidentally demolished. . . and everybody is going to say, ‘oops.’

“Oops isn’t going to work here,” he said. “Everybody knows we’re watching very closely.”

His last comment might seem far fetched, but not since Cole and local preservationists heard from their counterparts in New Jersey and New York City where one of the key partners in Lexington Square (BLDG Management) demolished a historic building in Jersey City and another one in lower Manhattan that was about to be considered by the New York Landmarks Preservation Commission.

“I have never witnessed such utter lack of regard for historic architecture,” wrote Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy president John Gomez of BLDG Management, one of Lexington Square’s partners. “I had never seen a developer treat the community in which it operates so disrespectfully.”

Brager-Gutman Building seems safe. (Photo by Elizabeth Suman)

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • Nate Payer

    The BDC’s rogue reputation continues, sadly.

  • http://kalidurga.blogspot.com/ Kali Durga

    What the $@#*($ is wrong with these developers and retail establishments? That’s one thing that I have to admire about companies like Starbucks and Chipotle– They buy existing buildings and incorporate their stores into them.

    It should be worth the extra money involved to maintain the history and character of a downtown area.

  • Claudia

    Thank you Brew & Joan Jacobson for a thoughtful and comprehensive article about this issue. Is there anything the average citizen can do to make it clear that we want these buildings preserved to the best extent possible?

  • http://www.griaonline.org Chris

    Outstanding article. I would double down on Claudia’s question: what would be the best way of making our voices heard on this issue?

  • Joan Jacobson

    Here are some suggestions for making your voices heard: You can email or call the new mayor’s office, contact the Baltimore Development Corporation or City Councilman Bill Cole, who represents downtown’s westside.

  • GMan

    This is one of those economic development issues Baltimore City is plagued with. We’d love to have retail and corporate business investment, but its usually at triple the price because of the historic rehab needed to be put into those buildings. Most businesses don’t deal with the hassle and go to the county.

    I’m curious as to what the most positive alternative can be to save these buildings while occupying them with businesses that will both be popular and employ local inhabitants. Right now that wholes stretch up to the Hippidrome is an economic hole. How much money does the city itself have to invest in these buildings? What are the specific tax credits and can they be utilized more effectively? If there are developers out there that would put up the funds to do the full and proper rehab of these buildings, can Baltimore Heritage identify and promote them to the public (someone mentioned the Chipolte/Starbucks variety. Would those be good corporate examples)?

    Historic preservation is noble, but leaders who stake those claims have to be able to provide viable, concrete alternatives to “just let it sit” otherwise the city will continue to suffer at a business level. The Odorite building fight was beyond inane, as is the sudden interest in the defunct Remington church that would block Lowe’s (there are concerns with the Lowe’s center, i.e., entrance/exits, frontage, etc., but this is not one of them).

  • Margaret

    It is fascinating to see the pull between preservation and development. I don’t live in Baltimore but have visited over the years. Charm City will lose its identity if it doesn’t figure out how to create/maintain economic viability without destroying its history and personality. These things can co-exist and long term economic viability will flow from thoughtful development that maintains a sense of place and history. Great story and photos.

  • http://www.baltimoreheritage.org Johns Hopkins

    To follow up on this insightful article, in addition to a rich architectural history, at least one building was important in the Civil Rights movement as well. In January of 1955, following a year of negotiations with Read’s Drug Store, a sit-in demonstration at the Read’s store at Howard and Lexington was organized by the Baltimore Congress of Racial Equality. This demonstration led to the desegregation of 37 Read’s lunch counters citywide, establishing a enduring association between this downtown corner and the struggle for civil rights in Baltimore and Maryland.

    Regarding other possible uses and interested parties for redeveloping the Superblock, 4 large-scale developers and 9 individual property owners responded to BDC’s request for proposals. Of these, the Maryland Historical Trust concluded that the developer the BDC ultimately selected submitted one of the least desirable proposals from a preservation perspective. The conclusion: there are other interested and qualified developers, and with proposals that better respect our heritage.

  • Tim Goecke

    I’m shocked, shocked! Jay Brodie picking a developer that has no interest in preserving historic buildings?!?! Unimaginable!

    To quote another shady character: follow the money …

  • Pingback: Challenges for preservation and development in the Superblock

  • Eerik Kreek

    “Among the threatened buildings are some great examples of Art Deco architecture and some even older buildings — structures that survived the Baltimore fire of 1904.”

    This part of town was never touched by the ’04 fire…

  • TClark

    Many squabbles like this don’t have a clear good guy and a clear bad guy. This tiff is one of those. I’d like to see what we get in return if we allow the developer to demolish these buildings. Then, we can actually see if the trade is worthwhile.

    Frankly, I wouldn’t walk down the street to see the old buildings shown above. (Brager-Gutman aside.) The buildings in the top photos above are nothing special architecturally and have no serious historic meaning in the history of the city. They are certainly nothing like Memorial Stadium, which we allowed to be demolished, or many other buildings of far more importance to the city, like the Southern Hotel or even the McCormick Spice Company building.

    Life moves on. Cities either change with it, or die. Change is less costly and less painful than letting blocks of a city perish so a handful of people can gloat over having saved something old.

    I do think we DO have a right to exact excellent replacement architecture in return for letting old buildings go. In other words, let’s not condemn older buildings so we can replace them with trash like many of the mundane buildings built in the downtown recently like Signet Tower, or Scarlett Place, or the Harborview “lighthouse” or the Rouse Company’s clunky green Galleria, or that total bow wow of a Marine Biology Building.

    Saving good or truly significant architecture, or buildings with serious historic importance is important for any city. However, the examples shown here are hardly on an historic par with Fort McHenry or on an architectural level with Cambridge Seven’s Baltimore Aquarium, or even Ben Thompson’s Harbor Place. Let’s pick our fights, and save our energy to demand high quality from what is being proposed, rather than enshrining fragments of architectural insignificance just because it may be possible to do it. Let’s get our civic priorities in line with a world where we preserving that which is truly worth preserving. If I were the architect of those buildings, I’d volunteer to knock them down myself, just to allow something better to be constructed in their place. –T. Clark

  • Pingback: Baltimore’s West Side Story Revisited | Baltimore Heritage

  • Oneballhunglow

    Worked on Howard Street. Found out about the Superblock over 10 years ago. Looks like shit down there.

  • Pingback: What’s Ahead for the Future of Downtown?

  • Bmorereppin

    This is disgusting. Why should Baltimore tear down some of its most unique and beautiful buildings to build something for out-of-towners? I seriously doubt that gourmet restaurants and “boutiques” will help the lower-income persons that actually live near the west-side. All this is is an opportunity for our corrupt mayor to gloat about “change”  and “renewal” RENEWAL INTO WHAT?

     Baltimore is not DC or New York, it is Baltimore. It’s gritty and working class, not effete and soft like most other east coast towns. Why can’t we embrace this and instead of pandering to the wealthy, start rebuilding our manufacturing base?

  • Unellu

    Bmorereppin,
    Lovely piece of writing and true.  And Joan none of the photos are showing.  I am sure they are beautiful–the Brew’s photography is always pure art, but they seem to be missing in this piece.  Would love to see them.

  • Pingback: Take a Look at the State of Downtown Report 2011

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

    • Yesterday, when Baltimore web developer and Ignite Baltimore co-founder Mike Subelsky tweeted that he was about to witness Nik Wallenda’s tightrope walk across the Inner Harbor, my ears perked up. Pix to come, Subelsky promised. Oooh, send them along I said! Recognizing his citizen journalist moment, Subelsky kindly agreed and sent along some great photos. [...]

Twitter

Facebook