Feedback

Battle lines drawn over Baltimore Wal-Mart proposal, media included

  • Story Link
  • 18

Categories

Benn Ray, owner of Hampden’s Atomic Books, couldn’t get over the language in the Baltimore Sun’s Friday Wal-Mart story, their first on the fact that a north Baltimore development proposal now includes a Wal-Mart, as well as a Lowe’s.

“A second Walmart store will open in Baltimore by the fall of 2011…” was the lede sentence.

“Why does it say ‘WILL open?’ The whole thing is being couched as a done deal, but they need to get a PUD,” Ray pointed out, correctly noting that, in order to be built, the mixed-use development would need to be green-lighted by the City Council as a  ”planned unit development.”

“It’s unbelievable,” said Ray. “The government and the media are just accepting this is going to happen.”

Indeed, within hours after the Wal-Mart news broke, Baltimore government, community and media types  were staking out their positions, overtly or implicitly, on this hot button issue.

Ray, who is also the president of the Hampden Merchants’ Association and famously fought off chain stores in funky-themed Hampden a few years ago, quickly signed an online petition for people opposed to the Wal-mart.

“We don’t want this in north Baltimore,” said Ray, whose neighborhood is close to Remington, where Wal-Mart wants to open the store.

Community walking tour in December with developer of proposed Remington project. Photo by John Dean.

Ray said that area supermarkets, drug stores and  many independently owned or operated businesses will be “killed” by competition from Wal-Mart’s deeply-discounted pharmacy, food, clothing and other merchandise.

He said that the Lowe’s home improvement store (which the developer described as an anchor store last fall) would knock off seven or eight small family-owned or operated hardware stores, like Falkenhan’s.

What about Wal-Mart’s claim that the store would create 250 jobs? “Of course they’re pushing this as a jobs thing,” he said, “but people should think about the fact that they are low-paying, part-time service jobs.”

How about the idea that people might like Wal-Mart’s low prices? They would lose out in other ways, he argued, after the social costs of  those lower-quality jobs and the crippled local economy take their toll.

“It’s interesting that this isn’t happening in Roland Park or Canton — it’s happening in Remington,” he added. “They’re taking advantage of the fact that Remington is a distressed area that they can exploit.”

Choosing sides

It didn’t take long last week for others to present the news and stake out their positions.

–  The Daily Record, which broke the story on Wednesday, also used fait-accompli language, not in its story, but in its headline:  ” Wal-Mart store to open,” it read. (Same way with the  Baltimore Business Journal piece. City Paper,  in its lede, correctly referred to the project as “proposed.”)

–  Bloggers and news websites posted short items on it, too. (When Brew contributor Gerald Neily posted,  it was not to discuss the news about Wal-Mart but to analyze the changes the architect has made to the layout of the project since it was first unveiled.) Benn Ray, in addition to drawing up the petition , got off  a couple of  posts about Wal-Mart on his blog, Mobtown Shank .

“There already are 18 Wal-Marts within a 20 mile radius of this proposed site,” he wrote. ”Do we really need a 19th?”

– When the Sun weighed in on Friday, they not only cast the coming of the store as a done deal, but framed the company’s public relations problems as, well, a thing of the past.

“Neighbors had a mixed reaction to Walmart, once derided for its treatment of employees and a market dominance that crowded out smaller retailers.”  (Don’t those neighbors know that is so ten minutes ago?!)

–  Sun business columnist Jay Hancock gave the big-box merchandiser a thumbs-up. “Benefits of the low prices Walmart brings to Baltimore will outweigh the negatives of low wages,” Hancock wrote. “Some liberals bash Walmart as the enemy of lower- and middle-income folks when in fact its low prices deliver huge benefits to working families.”)

–  And, of course, there was nothing but love from the president of the city’s quasi-governmental development entity, the Baltimore Development Corporation.

M J. “Jay” Brodie told the Sun that interest from Wal-Mart and Lowe’s is “a welcome sign that major contemporary retailers see Baltimore City as a viable market.”

– With one tiny Tweet, meanwhile, The Urbanite magazine deftly conveyed a complex double message to its hip Baltimore readership: “Welcome our new Wal-Mart overlords in Remington: They best Whole Foods in the Atlantic mag’s recent foodie face-off.”

The Atlantic article they linked to argues that Wal-Mart, not Whole Foods, might “actually save the family farm and make America more healthy.” ( Message: we’re cool enough to share your hostile feelings toward Wal-Mart , even as we clue you to this new positive spin on them.)

– As for the Wal-Mart spokeswoman, Rhoda Washington, her quotes to the Record and others emphasized not only the jobs a Wal-mart would bring, but  that it would be “consistent with where Baltimore is headed as far as the green movement.”

– Even the Sun’s Jacques Kelly opined on the Wal-Mart news, giving the multi-national, big-box chain not a greenwash, but a sepia treatment.  Their arrival in north Baltimore  “follows a long tradition of merchants who cater to the city’s memorably thrifty shoppers,”  he wrote, likening Wal-Mart to two of his beloved long-gone downtown retailers, Gutman’s and Brager’s.

“There is a good side to all this,” he concluded. “We remain unpretentious here and like it that way.”

24th Street looking north at proposed Remington Lowes and Wal-Mart.

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • telecommutenow

    We absolutely need more smary articles like this. Baltimore is too good for national chains to come in. Who wouldn’t want the Anderson dealership land to sit vacant and idle for years if it means keeping more retail options out? The comic book man is right- I can always go to the 17 Walmart’s in the County to shop.

  • http://www.mddailyrecord.com Robbie Whelan

    Thanks for the shout-out, but Fern, being a longtime newspaperwoman, I’d expect you to look a bit further beyond the headlines. Yes, our, headline says “Walmart to open in Remington,” but our lede, in the very next line, says, “Wal-Mart Stores Inc. *plans* to open a 93,000-square-foot big box retail location … in central Baltimore.” Headlines are written for space, and often leave out implicit information that is then explained, (obviously, if it’s a good article) in the body. That’s exactly what we did with our version of the article, not the “fait accompli” language you critiqued.

    Robbie Whelan
    The Daily Record

    • Editor

      yeah, I get the lede/headline distinction and I take your point. Reporters don’t have control over headlines generally. The critique is more properly directed at the headline and not the story.

    • Editor

      It’s tweaked to make that clearer, Robbie.

  • http://citythatbreeds.com Evan

    I can’t help but wonder if all of this controversy would be nearly as …controversial if it were a Wegman’s instead of a Walmart, even given the lack of infrastructural support for such a huge amount of traffic it’ll generate. Rather, the traffic it generates if it’s a success at all – the Walmart just three miles south pulls in traffic from Cherry Hill but the Sam’s Club is shuttered – people (at least, the ones with cars) are still quite content to drive the extra 5 or so miles outside of the city to give patronage to their big box store of choice and I’m not entirely convinced this will fare any better.

  • John

    Headlines, while written for space, also tend to slant toward the editorial wishes of a paper — while the accompanying text is objective. “Walmart plans Remington store” is an extra two characters. If that’s too long or considered redundant to the lede, add a question mark to the original to more accurately depict the facts.

  • http://baltimoregal.blogspot.com/ baltimoregal

    I think there would still be controversy if there was a Wegman’s, since many of us don’t want anything there taking away from other businesses with the same arena- the Safeway is right across the street, practically. The fact is the Wal-Mart is the latest surprise in a long list of surprises coming out of this project. How can they possibly be trusted to live up to any promises they’ve made thus far?

    And when areas like the Mondawmin Mall and Towson Commons and the S. Baltimore Wal-Mart Plaza are struggling, how can one in the middle of city, surrounded by residents and traffic lights and all the things others move to the suburbs to avoid- possibly survive?

  • jason

    I agree if this was whole foods or wegman it wouldnt be problem be evil company coming. personally hampden can walk off a short peer

  • Greg

    I have a couple of questions:

    1. Why does the article paint the retailers who overcharge an underserved population with reduced access to transportation as the victims? Shouldnt there be an article titled “National Store to finally provide competitive prices in the area?”

    2. While I am sure developers want to have the community on board, since when is the community their partner with the ability to make decisions? If the project fails, is everyone in the community going to chip in $1000 to get the developer out of bankruptcy? How about this novel idea: if you want to control something that happens on a peice of land, buy the land.

    3. It seems like there is typically a vocal extreme minority in many cases like this. I have no idea how deep the resentment is, but often the “opposition” is nothing more than 1 – 10 people with a printer and an email list.

    I think the first comment is right… perhaps the community would be better served by a huge vacant lot with used needles all over it for the kids to play on. I wish people would see this for what it is and that is an abuse of zoning or building regulations to serve a completely unrelated (and unintended) business agenda.

  • http://loopyrocket.blogspot.com Loopy

    Huffington Post had a good article on Wal-mart created jobs in a Chicago district.

    Although Wal-mart was toting “New Jobs!” they actually brought zero new jobs to the area. The article discussed the loss of Mom & Pop stores and jobs vs. New Wal-mart jobs. The study said it was “a wash”.

    I suggest we start a Keep Baltimore Weird Campaign, like Austin did!

  • Fritz

    “I wish people would see this for what it is and that is an abuse of zoning or building regulations to serve a completely unrelated (and unintended) business agenda.”

    I think this point is very important–and I’m not sure how Greg meant it, but it could go either way. Communities have control over land use. We don’t have control over who builds what as long as it conforms to our land use policies. If we allow for a PUD to go through it should conform to communally accepted land uses.

    From my point of view both Giant and Safeway aren’t so great with their lack of street facing, massive universally unfull parking, and lack of conformity with the the surroundings. I think the planned development in Remington is just taking it one step farther. I don’t want suburban land uses in the city. That’s my major complaint.

  • http://walmart.com dan

    greg sounds like a plant from wal-mart.

    here are my answers to your quesitons:

    1. small business doesn’t over charge. they have to pay much higher distribution costs than large retailers so the cost per-unit is much more expensive for them, since they aren’t buying in massive bulk, like a lowes or walmart does. also, they also normally pay their works a fair wage, unlike wal-mart, so their costs are higher there as well. so, that would be why the writer depicts small business owners as victims to big business.

    2. THE COMMUNITY should be THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR in any urban planning porject! not the short term “hey i can get cheap towels here.” your novel idea of buying land is like saying if you hate health care buy the hospital. land is insanely expensive and getting a commercial loan is very difficult in today economy. as for the developer,

    3. its not a vocal minority. i think most of the educated public would not want a store like this in their neighborhood. stores like homogenize and kill local, self owned small business. this would be like putting tape on a slit open stomach. the neighborhood needs actual retail and commerce. it needs a community center and park. it needs stores that will increase foot traffic not traffic. it needs real jobs and careers, not the shadow of a job that leaves people in poverty without any chance of growth.

  • http://hampdenarchives.com Bobby Spicer

    I’m sorry but I have lived in Hampden all of my life & guess what I welcome a Wal-Mart! Finally a store in my neighborhood that I can actually buy something in. Now for the company’s crying that they might get put out of business I’m sorry I do feel for you but its called competition & most stores in Hampden tend to price gauge like hell. So decide, do we just close up or lower prices.

    Another benefit these people don’t want to point out is that this will provide hundred of jobs to people in the area, its not like most people who actually live here in Hampden have any luck at all of being employed on the avenue. The fact is most of the people bitching are not from the neighborhood & most of them do not actually have Hampdens interest at heart!

    As for traffic, I live on falls road & because of the stores on the avenue most people decide to park on my street for free parking or because its close to the block, so most of the time I end up needing to park all the way down my street about .6-.8 miles down the street! So get used to it, I mean I had to because of the avenue & I only live here!!!!!!! I’m tired of going on my avenue to see these shops that normal Hampden locals wont ever be able to shop at besides the bars & such! So yay we finally get something realistic. I love how our bakery of 100 + years old ended up being forced off our avenue. Or the person who purchased the old, old bar called the hampden house just so they could get the liquor licence.

    If you want to raise hell, you should have raised hell about stuff like that, but that don’t matter to those people. Its only my neighborhoods heritage!!!!

  • Fritz

    Bobby, as long we as have an incentive to drive rather than walk to stores in our own neighborhoods that will always happen. And the Walmart/Lowes development is designed for the car. It is a problem that neighborhoods are losing their local food stores–bakeries, butchers, pastry shops–but that’s not something Walmart will help. Keeping Remington zoned in a way that gives multiple stores a chance to compete for vacant space would help. And, if one store leaves another can fill it. If either Walmart of Lowes closes then almost nothing else can replace it and you have a site far worse than Anderson.

  • http://bmore.blogspot.com Heylucas

    A couple of things:
    The Shoppers and Target at Mondawmin appear to be doing very well and that re-design of the mall and transit hub is a huge improvement.

    Interesting article comparing Walmart and Whole Foods in the Atlantic

    In the long term, I hear those arguing for more walker\biker friendly development. Sounds good.

  • Jeff

    Last night, at the intersection shown in this story’s picture, there was a fatal shooting. A few days ago there was another one just a few blocks east. So what are we trying to preserve here? If it’s done right, I see the development as a huge plus over the current situation. I live about 2 miles north of that site, and work about 2 miles south. I like eating/shopping in Hampden. I like the new Waverly Ace. And I suspect I’ll like having a vibrant development at that location. Let’s move forward.

  • http://www.IDimpact.com Mary Brady

    So, how many who are worried to death about an inner city Walmart in Baltimore (sorry, 25th St. a few blocks north of North Avenue is not “Hampden”…) have snuck off in thier little gas eaters to a suburban WalMart for an occasional discount shopping experience? C’mon, fess up you underground WalMart shoppers. ( When I could afford to be politically correct, I wouldn’t own up to it, either.) My observation is that in the new normal, WalMart IS a Mom & Pop operation. I’ve had occasion in my travels away from Baltimore to observe WalMarts in Madison, WI, Beloit, WI and Panama City Beach, FL that are as different from one another as Atomic Comix is from Barnes & Noble. The local flavor (meaning the ‘hood) and specific store management dictates far greater diversity in implementation than one would imagine if one confined one’s Walmart experience to what one reads.

    The Madison WalMart, located on the typically affluent far west side of Madison, a squatter smack in the heart of Limousine LIberal territory, was a pit of chaos and mismanagement. I attempted to shop there once, and never repeated the experience. The Beloit WalMart, in a much more conservative small city, was by comparison an oasis of retail diversity and order, and employed older workers not only grateful to have a part time job, but with plenty of expertise and pride in their areas. I particularly remember being walked through a history of the blues in the CD aisle by a delightful older boomer having a ball with his retirement job. Beloitians loved their WalMart, but missed it’s predecessor, the K-mart. Moms and Pops still managed to eke out a living, somehow. The Panama City Beach WalMart is simply unspeakable, (don’t ever go there on Hallowe’en; it’s so redudant!) but now the new one planned for nearby Destin (think Redneck Rodeo Drive) is drawing fire. Which only shows that even rednecks have become pretentious…

    As a twenty year veteran resident of Baltimore’s inner city I’ll bet the 25th St. WalMart takes on plenty of eccentricity merely by virtue of it’s location. And I’ll bet if you ask Station North proponents their real reaction to this planned use, those with a lick of sense will see it as a good thing. There’s plenty of room for Mom, Pop and Uncle Wally in Baltimore’s delightfully eccentric retail topography. WalMart’s food vendors are not going to be getting liquor licences and competing with The Diz or Sterling Oyster House any time soon…

    Our civic model ought to be twenty blocks of Manhattan, not Mayberry. WalMart has gone green, organic and is giving domestic partner benefits. I hope it gives Whole Paycheck as well as Safeway and all the other “Mom and Pops” it’s competing with absolute fits. Maybe they’ll even bring back the BLUE LIGHT SPECIAL! (Now that would really reflect a sense of place.) IMHO!

  • Phillip

    Food for thought

    Walmart: High Cost of Low Price
    http://www.freedocumentaries.org/film.php?id=105

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

    • Yesterday, when Baltimore web developer and Ignite Baltimore co-founder Mike Subelsky tweeted that he was about to witness Nik Wallenda’s tightrope walk across the Inner Harbor, my ears perked up. Pix to come, Subelsky promised. Oooh, send them along I said! Recognizing his citizen journalist moment, Subelsky kindly agreed and sent along some great photos. [...]

Twitter

Facebook