Feedback

Expand Baltimore’s free Charm City Circulator buses

to cover the whole inner city?

cleanergreener

Today is Day One of the 2nd route for the free Charm City Circulator buses, on Charles St.

Photo by: Fern Shen

  • Story Link
  • 7

Categories

Beginning today, the City government is adding its Charm City Circulator to the four local bus routes the MTA already runs on Charles Street between Cross Street Market northward to Penn Station. Riders will now have shiny, new “clean, green” buses to choose from in the peak hour, in addition to the eighteen buses the MTA already runs along most of this route.

If they wish, folks can now stand at a Charles Street bus stop and wait while three or four of the same old MTA buses pass by until a bright, gleaming slightly-smaller CCC bus pulls up. And they’ll save $1.60 in the process.

We watched today as the new Purple Route Circulator pulled up to Penn Station, drawing curious stares from regular MTA riders awaiting the #61 MTA, which also runs up Charles Street (and continues up into Roland Park.) If only THAT route were clean, green and free!

So, here’s an idea from the Department of Redundancy Department: since the city seems to have given up on the MTA, why not expand the Circulator into an entire inner-city transit system and let them take over the whole thing?

An MTA bus, with a free Charm City Circulator bus coming up behind it on almost identical route. . . except it doesn't go to Curtis Bay, hon! (Photo by Fern Shen)

As the second of three planned Charm City bus lines, this new Purple Route is the one which most closely crowds in on what the MTA already provides. Functionally, the routes are so similar that the simple essential difference jumps out: It’s not the MTA.

The birth of the Charm City Circulator is the culmination of decades of MTA failure to give the city’s business and civic leaders what they want, so now the city is doing it themselves.

And they already want even more. In addition to a third route to Hopkins Hospital coming soon, a planned extension to Fort McHenry is already in the works, and Midtown leaders want an extension to Charles Village and Hopkins University as well. Hopkins already runs its own bus service just as many other local colleges do – another byproduct of perceived MTA deficiencies.

Even the proposed $1.8 billion Red Line plan was conceived by business and civic leaders, much more than by the MTA.

As such, all of these transit initiatives totally fail to consider the comprehensive impact on the transit system as a whole, which is why they create such blatant redundancy.

It’s long past time to deal with these transit needs in a comprehensive manner. The MTA needs to finally recognize that the city does indeed have special needs that cannot be addressed as a one-size-fits-all transit system, and the city needs to recognize that it cannot just keep adding costly new lines willy-nilly to the transit stew.

But the MTA has heard all that before, and the city has apparently given up on them, and put its scarce and precious money where its mouth is.

So here is a solution that gives everyone what they want

The Charm City Circulator could be expanded to become a transit system serving the entire inner city. This would replace all local MTA service within the specified area. MTA bus service would be limited mostly to express buses between downtown and transit hubs where the two systems would meet at the perimeter, with intervening stops limited to major destinations and transfer points .

The transit hub locations would be carefully selected to define the boundaries between the two systems. Geography would be the determining factor, not political jurisdictions as is the case with most local/regional systems in Maryland and around the country.

Some obvious transit hub locations would include:

1 – The Mondawmin Metro station – The MTA already terminates all of its longer distance bus routes from outer communities such as Park Heights and Liberty Heights at this point to feed riders into the subway.

2 – The West Baltimore MARC station – MTA would run all of its remaining regional buses non-stop to downtown on the Franklin-Mulberry Expressway, as they already do with the #40 Quick-Bus.

3 – Baltimore Travel Plaza – MTA service would use the I-95 Fort McHenry Tunnel to downtown, while the Charm City Circulators would use Boston, O’Donnell, Eastern and Fayette through Canton, Fells Point and Highlandtown.

4 – Northwood Shopping Center – MTA express service would use Loch Raven Boulevard to downtown while the CCC would take over all local service to Charles Village and Waverly via 33rd Street, Charles Street, Greenmount Avenue et al, and to Morgan University.

The MTA’s cost savings from this concept could be passed on to Charm City to operate the new system, along with financing from a new “Transit District”. Another important source of participation would be from the colleges and other organizations which now pay for their own transit, but which should benefit greatly by being an integral part of the new service instead.

The boundaries of this district would closely conform to that of the high density portion of the city, where mass transit really needs to be an essential part of urban life, so that the costs and benefits of this service could be kept closely aligned. Geographically, this boundary would be fairly obvious, including roughly the Gwynns Falls to the west, Middle Branch to the south, I-95 to the east, and 39th Street to the north.

This makes much more sense than attempting to devise a regional transit district encompassing the city and all the surrounding suburbs. Metropolitan areas that have done that have had to endure constant carping from the outer areas that are barely served, and exploitation from those just beyond its borders. It also makes more sense than forcing all city residents to pay for this, and adding another arbitrary artifice at the city line (along with other taxes, insurance rates, public school zones, etc.). It would also enable transit fares to the outer areas to rise to more appropriate levels, and service to be optimized to the needs of longer distance riders.

The common perception is that as a statewide agency, the MTA is just too far above the people to be sensitive to their needs. From that, the Charm City Circulator was born, but it is a messy and inefficient compromise. The MTA and the city both need to realize that the city’s special urban needs should not be met by simply plopping a new system on top of the old one, but by making all aspects of the entire system work better.

- Fern Shen contributed to this post.

  • Jacob

    Agreed on all fronts (especially taking the CCC all the way to Canton), but let’s not forget that the CCC is primarily aimed at taking tourists from Penn Station to their hotels and then shuttling between the B&O and Fell’s Point while MTA is percieved as being for commuters.

    Thus, they are essentially the same service, but they are serving two entirely different audiences. Tourists don’t need service to Hopkins, and most commuters don’t want to stop at the B&O.

  • Richard Selden

    Gerald, I’d like your take on the DC Circulator. What I observed during the first two years was a lot of nearly empty Circulators clogging up bus routes and stops, making it even harder for the often full buses-of-yesteryear to keep to their schedule (and slowing down traffic generally). Now the buses-of-yesteryear are being replaced in DC, removing what little reason there is for the existence of the DC Circulator.

  • Dunn

    The redundancy issue certainly should be examined. I would be happy if the Orange Line just went a little further into Fells Point and Canton with large residential populations. Terminating at Harbor East seems like a waste. I live in Butchers Hill and would love to use it. By the time I walk to Central Avenue I just keep walking because I am already near downtown anyway.

    The Purple Line does make more sense to me. But even this line might as well go up to Hopkins.

    I mentioned this before, it seems like the people who designed the routes don’t live city.

  • Dunn

    @ Jacob – I hope the CCC planners were not just thinking of tourists, but you appear to be right. However, it is a city funded system, so it more than any should serve its residents.

  • John

    Transit in Baltimore City has always been a problem. All one has to do is recall the pre-MTA days of the Baltimore Transit Company (BTC), AKA Better Take a Cab.

  • Youssef

    This all sounds way too practical to actually be adopted. If you want your ideas to be implemented in this town, they have to make no sense, especially when it comes to transit.

    On a serious note, my primary concern with implementing this plan is the speed of the circulator buses. They are very slow to accelerate and don’t reach a particularly exhilarating top speed on the few occasions where they’re given the chance. I don’t know if this is the hybrid design at work or the way the drivers were trained to drive them, but they are currently too slow for daily commutes of more than a very short stint.

  • Hankmd5331

    Thank you for the article. We are coming to Baltimore, from North Carolina, by train and the circulator looks like a wonderful way for us to get around during our stay. Your publication is the only one where I found out that it is “fare free”.

    /s/hankmd5331@earthlink.net

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • January 27, 2012

    • Catching up on a slew of interesting things to do and read this weekend that we almost lost track of in the Kickstarter hub-bub. Here are just a few: SATURDAY (1/28/12) New Mercury Non-fiction Reading – Check out tell-it-like-it-is education blogger Edit Barry (see below) and a pack of other feisty non-fictional characters from the [...]

Twitter

Facebook