Feedback

Baltimore students march to save Read’s, site of historic desegregation sit-in

reads protest jessica cottrell 1

City Neighbors Charter School students and others protest plans to demolish the former Read’s Drug Store building in downtown Baltimore, the site of a successful 1955 lunch counter sit-in that desegregated the Read’s chain.

Photo by: Jessica Cottrell

  • Story Link
  • 5

Categories

Chanting “One, Two, Three, Four – Save Read’s Drug Store!” a group of about 40 students from Baltimore’s City Neighbors Charter School picketed Saturday in front of the former Read’s Drug Store, the site of a 1955 protest by African-American students that forced the chain to serve blacks at its lunch counters.

A redevelopment plan for downtown Baltimore’s struggling west side, supported by some city and state officials, would demolish this building, among others. The students and their teacher came out on a chilly Saturday to say that wouldn’t be right.

“This place is the site of the first successful sit-in to end segregation in the country!” said Peter French, the City Neighbors social studies teacher who brought the students.

Preservationists, pointing out that the Read’s protest predates the more famous 1960 Greensboro, N.C. Woolworth’s sit-in, have been trying to call attention to the building’s Civil Rights history as they mount a campaign to stop demolition of a group of buildings they say have historic and architectural significance.

The developer says it is not cost-effective to save all the old buildings in the so-called Superblock, in part because they are not easily converted into the kinds of mid-sized stores — such as TJ Maxx or Bed Bath and Beyond — that they hope to attract.

Advocates of the Lexington Square project, including the Baltimore Development Corporation, say redevelopment is desperately needed in the blighted area and argue that a plaque might be sufficient to commemorate the Read’s sit-in history.

Groups like Baltimore Heritage, present at Saturday’s protest, say preservation should be at the center of any downtown redevelopment strategy. That seemed to be the position of the chanting students, who carried signs that said “Save Our History” and “Honk for civil rights” and “Don’t Tear Down Our History.”

After circling the block, the students picketed in front of the now-boarded-up Read’s, at Howard and Lexington streets.

Among those who came out to support them was one of the original protesters, Helena Hicks, who today, at 76, is a member of the Baltimore Commission for Historic and Architectural Preservation. In 1955, though, she was simply a Morgan College student (as she recalled it recently on WEAA’s Marc Steiner Show) who wanted to sit down at the Read’s and eat something and couldn’t, because of the color of her skin.

“We could go in Read’s and buy a pack of cigarettes or a pack of gum, but you’re hungry and you can’t sit down. It might be cold, it might be raining, it might be snowing and you can’t sit down and drink a hot cup of coffee or cocoa or tea or anything,” said Hicks. “And so I guess you get to the point . . . people just collectively are sick of it.”

– Many thanks to Gabriela Bulisova’s MICA students for these photos.

Students protest to save site of lunch counter demonstration from being torn down. (Photo by Sarah Adams.)

Students protest plan to dear down site of 1955 lunch counter sit-in. (Photo by Sarah Adams.)

"Our History Matters," one sign at the Read's protest read. (Pho to by Jessica Cottrell.)

"Our History Matters," one sign at the Read's protest read. (Photo by Jessica Cottrell.)

 Dr. Helena Hicks and her son. Hicks was part of the original protest to desegregate Read's, 56 years ago. (Photo by Jessica Cottrell)

Dr. Helena Hicks and her son. Hicks was part of the original protest to desegregate Read's, 56 years ago. (Photo by Jessica Cottrell)

Students' signs explained why the Reads building mattered to them. (Photo by Jessica Cottrell)

Students' signs explained why the Reads building mattered to them. (Photo by Jessica Cottrell)

Protesters in front of the former Read's building, slated for demolition. (Photo by Sarah Adams.)

Protesters in front of the former Read's building, slated for demolition. (Photo by Sarah Adams.)

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • Lsnyder

    Congratulations Jessica and Sarah!
    Laurie Snyder

  • Curtis A.

    “Honk for 30 more years of blight!”
    “Save Super Block for Drug Users!
    “No child exploitation! . . .Oh, wait, never mind. Honey, carry this sign and we’ll go out for ice cream afterwards.”

    My last and final comments, albeit sarcastic, on this subject as a person who for 2 years visited his now wife at the 100 block of Howard, has a graduate degree in city planning, and a person who questions why historians of the Civil Rights Era failed to write about or even give a footnote to the importance to Read’s Drug Store until forty years later (hints: “publish or perish”). I don’t mean to imply that a civil rights sit-in isn’t a positive event to take pride in, just that it did not have the historical influence and impact purported by anti-Super Block preservationists. How many sit-ins were there in the 1950′s and 1960′s?

    I one day hope to see the block area’s transformation and have a reason to return. I also hope for more city generatated tax revenue, better city services, transit-oriented development, and more downtown residents so the city center doesn’t empty-out at 5 PM. It’s ALL CONNECTED and it won’t come about without investment and a look to the future.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SXS2KHWUDYK5BKB4XNCCAAQDLE Gerald Neily

      Civil rights historians may have been late on this, but the bigtime “transit oriented” developers have been just as late, and they’ve been at it to make money. Grand retail schemes for the superblock and vicinity have been floating since the original department stores started floundering in the ’70s. There was Lexington Mall, the Howard Street bus mall, heavy rail, light rail, Morton’s, and that’s only the ones that actually got built, not the ones that died on drawing boards. Most recently, the big boxes have spoken again – they want to be two miles north at 25th Street Station.

      • Richard Chambers

        Correct, Gerry. Check out issues of Baltimore Magazine or the Sun magazine from the 1970s and you will invariably find glowing articles about how the West Side is just one mega-development away from being rejuvenated. It’s all a crock. Regardless of how one thinks about saving Read’s, I find the outpouring of support for a local Civil Rights landmark rather exhilarating.

        • Curtis A.

          Redevelopment plans in Baltimore are a crock because developers and respective retail tenants run a market/demographic report and say to themselves “too much risk, let’s put our equity someplace else.” Investing in Baltimore proper beyond the scenic harbor is a risk with no gurantee of successs. Look what happened to Streuver Brothers — they went out of business. Developers have to run their numbers and assumptions through the gauntlet of investor and lender financial analysts and risk departments, and naysayers have more sway than they used to. BDC is trying to pretty-up an ugly pig or untie Baltimore’s other arm — choose your analogy.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

    • Yesterday, when Baltimore web developer and Ignite Baltimore co-founder Mike Subelsky tweeted that he was about to witness Nik Wallenda’s tightrope walk across the Inner Harbor, my ears perked up. Pix to come, Subelsky promised. Oooh, send them along I said! Recognizing his citizen journalist moment, Subelsky kindly agreed and sent along some great photos. [...]

Twitter

Facebook