Feedback

Downtown Baltimore: land of the lost tenant

Facing an office vacancy rate of 23 percent, City Hall and downtown promoters are laying the groundwork for fresh public investment.

downtown vacancy hopkins plaza pnc

2 Hopkins Plaza: 42 percent vacant and expecting to lose chief tenant, PNC Financial Services, when lease expires.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

  • Story Link
  • 9

Categories

Baltimore learned something of an open secret last week – that some of those fine high-rises making up the city’s skyline enclose an awful lot of empty space.

In a one-two punch, the Mayor’s Downtown Task Force and the Downtown Partnership published reports warning that Baltimore’s commercial core is hurting badly.

Overall, the downtown – measured as one mile in each direction from Pratt and Light streets – contains 5 million square feet of vacant office space, or 19 percent of the total, the mayor’s report said. In the central downtown north of Lombard Street and south of Fayette, the vacancy rate jumps to 23 percent.

While not as bad as America’s perennial whipping boy, Detroit, whose office vacancies stand at 27 percent, Baltimore’s surplus square footage compares poorly with Washington, D.C., (9.2 percent vacancy), New York City (10.7 percent) and Philadelphia (15 percent).

Viewed from the ground, the loss of tenants translates into many haunted buildings.

Take 2 Hopkins Plaza. Hailed as a symbol of rejuvenated Baltimore when it opened in 1969, the 24-story tower is now 42 percent vacant, according to the mayor’s report. Worse, PNC Financial Services, the chief tenant, is planning to leave the building when its lease runs out. With it will go about 2,000 employees.

 The landmark Art Deco building at 10 Light St. is 35 percent vacant. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

The landmark Art Deco building at 10 Light St. is 35 percent vacant. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

With its distinctive mansard roof, 10 Light Street has been one of the city’s premier skyscrapers for years. The 34-story Art Deco pile is now 35 percent vacant. Bank of America is paying rent on the vacant space under a long-term lease, but that will soon end, leaving 240,000 square feet without tenants.

Heading east toward City Hall, more ghostlike buildings abound.

One of the biggest spaces, 225 North Calvert St., is also one of the least utilized. The boxlike brick structure, boasting 379,000 square feet of space, is 87 percent vacant. Maryland National Bank originally owned the building for its credit card and other back-office operations. After Bank of America acquired MNB’s successor, the operations were closed. Only a few stray tenants occupy the gargantuan building.

Down Calvert St., the mayor’s task force identified two other troubled properties. The old Provident Bank Building, at Lexington and Calvert, is 65 percent vacant, its major tenant being an M&T Bank branch office. The Equitable Building, at Fayette and Calvert, is 35 percent empty.

A Faltering Downtown

Overall, 23 downtown buildings or properties are underutilized and need immediate attention, according to Downtown Partnership, a nonprofit group funded by the city and prominent business interests.

The group is calling for more vacant office space to be converted to apartments. It is asking the city to condemn and acquire certain vacant properties when owners let them fall into disrepair. And it wants City Hall to create a Tax Increment Finance, or TIF, district in the most troubled part of downtown – the area south of Fayette and north of Lombard between Paca and South streets – to pay for public improvements. The mayor’s task force fell in line with very similar recommendations.

Downtown Partnership paints a bleak picture of an area it otherwise likes to promote as “a great place for businesses, employees, residents and visitors.” The report it issued last week notes:

This ex-bank building at 225 N. Calvert is 87 percent empty. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

This ex-bank building at 225 N. Calvert is 87 percent empty. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

“In City Center and the Westside of downtown, some property owners are sitting on space that is leased but unoccupied. This may be fine for their bottom line but contributes to a lack of street level activity and the sense that downtown is faltering.

“Other key projects have stalled or are making slow progress, including several hotel conversions and the Superblock. And downtown is pockmarked by lots where buildings have come down to make way for new development, only to have the project mothballed.”

So what’s needed?

The report says, “Some of the biggest development opportunities in downtown – a new arena, Convention Center expansion and Lexington Market improvements – need new vision and a plan for moving forward. Many smaller city-owned properties sit empty. Even when these properties have been identified for development, there lacks a sense of urgency, particularly on downtown’s Westside.”

Of course, this requires money – lots of it.

Déjà vu

Funneling public funds into downtown is hardly a new idea. It dates back to the 1950s when City Hall and downtown business groups declared the central city ugly and dysfunctional and jointly inaugurated the Charles Center urban renewal project.

In the 1960s, former mayors Theodore McKeldin and Tommy D’Alesandro reconstituted the same coalition to redevelop the Inner Harbor.

Succeeding mayors, most notably William Donald Schaefer, made sure that state and federal offices were built in the Inner Harbor and surrounding blocks, which has made central Baltimore akin to Washington in its dependence on government employment. (Overall, 8.5 million square feet of greater downtown’s office space is owned or leased by government – 51 percent by the State of Maryland, 30 percent by the feds and 19 percent by the city.)

Then came Harbor East, rising from the ashes of abandoned factories and crumbling wharfs with the mighty assist of city tax credits.

Competition from new office space inevitably leads to reduced use and abandonment of older property. For one thing, today’s office tenants demand state-of-the-art telecommunications, open floor plans, abundant natural light and, the latest trend: low-carbon-footprint building systems.

It’s costly and sometimes impractical to convert older buildings to these standards, especially in a period when the economy is weak and demand low. What the two reports “discovered” this week was that the process of office abandonment has worked its way through the old commercial district to Charles Center, the pride of 1960s Baltimore. Thus, the flurry of coordinated reports and closely aligned recommendations.

The life span of city renewal can be maddeningly short. Yet again, we’re told that downtown Baltimore needs a financial lifeline, and once more, City Hall and business promoters are gearing up to secure a fresh round of public cash and tax breaks.

In front of the marble facade of a Baltimore Street tower. (Photo by Mark Reutter

In front of the marble facade of a Baltimore Street tower. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

  • pat

    I know as a small (80 employees) business owner, the issue with downtown is the added expense of parking, and the lack of a good subway system. Toss in the fact that the buildings are outdated, and it becomes insurmountable. Projects like the State Center don’t help either, as they just expand the problem by adding additional office space to the equation that are publicly subsidized, taking away money from true infrastructure. And I can’t imagine a new arena would make a bit of difference to the problem.

  • UpperFells

    Taxes have consequences.

    High property taxes, high parking taxes, high everything taxes… they all make the cost of doing business downtown higher than it is in places like Hunt Valley and Columbia.

    Throw in high crime rates and the fact that so few of the kinds of people who work downtown office jobs want to live in the city of Baltimore, and you find yourself with the vacancy problem that downtown faces.

    Fix the taxes and crime, and downtown will improve. Sounds like a familiar refrain, doesn’t it?

  • Nate

    The City has done this to itself, with the BDC subsidizing oodles of developments AWAY from downtown thereby constantly undermining it. What a surprise. And how are we to promote more residential if the jobs aren’t there to go along with it.

    No more subsidy for standard office space downtown. None. No more. It needs to stop. Westport? Sorry, Pat Turner. Get real. State Center? Wait awhile. Canton Crossing? Wake up. Harbor Point? You must be outta your mind.

    What good is a place like Harbor East if the heart and soul of downtown is a wreck? I’ve been harping on this practice and the state of downtown for years, ever since the BDC’s parking garage bonanza, Jay Brodie: “we have an immediate 3600 car deficit! We need to do this to keep businesses here!” Sold that snake oil one too many times. The fact of the matter is that rate of office space attrition was faster than the rate of residential conversion and renovation. It’s a zero game, dudes.

    Come on, man. I wasn’t born yesterday.

    • Leo McDermott

      Downtown Baltimore has all of the makings for a 24/7 city on the scale of Washington, D.C. and other cities across the country. The Inner Harbor, ballparks, neighborhoods, prestigious colleges, etc are rich in tradition and charm, which is lacking in so many cities of similar size around the country. The largest challenge is to reduce the tax rate and to bring new corporations and jobs to the downtown area, which is seldom discussed.

      The Downtown Partnership needs to recognize these issues and start promoting the city to the rest of the nation and world as a great place to establish their business. Their recent proposals of giving away retail space on the 1st floor of buildings and proposing TIF districts to further subsidize new developments is lacking in creativity and naive. Threatening existing property owners with condemnation if they don’t develop their lots or lease their buildings to just anybody at a net loss, is not the answer.

      The downtown area needs new blood. The game of musical chairs (i.e. moving existing office tenants from one building into another building) leads to negative absorption and no real progress. If we can reduce the tax rate and attract more corporations, then private enterprise will follow. Of course, this will require real leadership and politicians willing to risk their own necks.

      – A Concerned Citizen

  • Nate

    Another note: I see some tweet people mentioning “record” amount of vacancy. I recall many a Sunpaper articles referring to a 25 percent vacancy rate in the earlier 90′s after a real estate market crash and a modest overbuilding of office towers in downtown capped off with the Alex Brown building around 1991. If one excludes Inner Harbor East, there were no other office buildings of consequence near downtown until 750 E. Pratt went up, say around 2002 or so.

    Moreover, it’s unfortunate Baltimore had building booms during bad architectural periods, such as Brutalism. 225 N. Calvert St. is a testament that we should never allow garbage to be built–but we still do. Think the new Hilton or the east half of Lockwood Place.

    Lastly, it should really be pointed out that our branch office city syndrome that has been developing since the Depression certainly drags us down horribly.

  • Joan Jacobson

    Great story, Mark. Add a future Westport office tower to competition that includes Harbor East and State Center.

  • Baltimoreplaces

    I sincerely hope Baltimore can live up to it potential. Baltimore has the makings of a tremendous come back story. It is an underdog, frequently exploited, and suffers from a lack of vision. The city has a tremendous amount of assets – from location to charm and character. Many people love this city and “Believe,” but its leadership and voice has been poor and stifled. I don’t think either truly represent what this city is so badly yearning for.A lot of people really don’t want to live and work in the suburbs, some don’t even realize it. There are many reasons to live and work in cities, especially today with what our future has in store. Things are changing, yet Baltimore remains late, it is stuck. Instead of looking to the past, Baltimore should create a new beginning.

  • craigpurcell

    It is time to get on with adaptive reuse conversions of the office stock downtown to mixed use loft space leaning toward residential.  SOHO me baby.  Parking (or close to) in one’s building is a problem. Too bad we don’t have an effective transit system – but oh well…

    Clearly “Automated Parking” which uses less cubic square per parking space is one r0ute to go in smaller volume decentralized garages that fit in with the historic fabric. One would not want to have Superblock like fadacectomies or outright demolitions of all of out historic fabric downtown now would we ?

    The downtown could use some more pocket parks, piazzas & tree lined street so as to be suitable to live in – a few shops would help.

    What would be left downtown if not for the architecture & urban design ?

  • http://twitter.com/MairZdoatz Mair

    It is beyond me how they can keep being allowed to spend money on the basis of future ‘projections’. 
    Keep giving away the farm and pretty soon you won’t have any acreage left.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • February 16, 2012

    • Checking through and approving the comments on The Brew every hour or two is an odd daily routine, sort of like seining in Chesapeake Bay – you never know what you’re going to come up with. Lately, I thought, our net has been bringing up some particularly cool specimens – intentional and “found” poems and [...]

Twitter

Facebook