Feedback

CHAP clears away preservation roadblocks to Superblock project

IMG reads_0001

The developer issued this rendering of the restored walls of the corner Read’s Drug Store and surrounding Superblock development.

Photo by: Dawson Co.

  • Story Link
  • 4

Categories

The Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation (CHAP) deferred on Tuesday giving landmark status to buildings on Baltimore’s Superblock” site for a year.

That decision – coupled with the agency’s conceptual approval of the developer’s exterior treatment of the former Read’s Drug Store – removes two major hurdles facing the project.

Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has mounted a very public campaign calling on CHAP to remove its restrictions on the Read’s property. On Monday, she toured the site with some local ministers and said getting the project underway was vital for the West Side’s economic development and job creation.

Developers Financially Vetted

The development group, led by the Atlanta-based Dawson Co. and including BLDG Management and Crown Acquisitions, has not given a definite timetable for construction, which is not expected to start until later in the year.

CHAP Commissioner Robert C. Embry listens to speakers at yesterday's hearing, with a scale model of Superblock's southeast corner in the foreground. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

CHAP Commissioner Robert C. Embry listens to speakers yesterday, a scale model of Superblock in the foreground. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

M. J. “Jay” Brodie, who negotiated the deal as president of the Baltimore Development Corp., told CHAP that the developers had been fully vetted and possessed the financial capacity to build the large-scale project.

Originally, the developers planned to demolish the Read’s building, site of a 1955 sit-in by Morgan State students protesting segregated lunchrooms in Baltimore. After preservationists and some civil rights activists protested, Rawlings-Blake brokered what she called a compromise plan that retained the building’s two exterior walls.

Preservationists argued that this compromise was, in fact, a violation of a 2001 agreement between city and state officials to preserve the historic buildings bounded by Lexington, Howard and Fayette streets and Park Ave.

CHAP yesterday accepted the developer’s plan to restore the masonry and ornamentation of the ex-Read’s store. The commission called on the developer to replace the fifth-floor windows in the same configuration as the original building and to match the existing etched glass panels with new thermal panels.

Bailey Pope pledged there would be no demolition on the site by the developer until financing and construction permits are in place. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Bailey Pope spoke on behalf of Dawson Co., the lead developer of the site. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

One Building to Be Fully Preserved

Bailey Pope, a spokesman for Dawson Co., said the developers would rehabilitate only one building in full – the former Brager-Gutman department store at the corner of Lexington and Park.

For buildings such as the historic Pickwick Theatre and cast-iron McCrory Building, as much as possible of the exterior facades will be retained, but inside the properties will be gutted to make way for modern floor plans for retailers.

Nearly all of the buildings along Fayette St. have been designated as “non-contributing” to the historic ambiance and will be torn down.

An official from the Baltimore Development Corp. said the city wants to demolish the ex-Greyhound Bus Terminal on Fayette St. as soon as possible because it attracts homeless people and poses a safety hazard.

Pope pledged that the developers would not demolish any buildings until “we have financing and construction permits in place.” He said all future construction plans would be submitted to the Maryland Historical Trust for review and approval.

Gibson Calls for Landmark Deferral

The motion to defer landmark status for buildings for a year was proposed by CHAP Commissioner Larry Gibson.

Gibson said he did not particularly like the developer’s Superblock plan because it clashed with the city’s own West Side Strategic Plan, and he did not agree with the group’s “big-box-retail” strategy. Nevertheless, he argued that CHAP should approve the plan for procedural and strategic reasons:

Because homeless people are breaking into the former Greyhound Bus Station, the city would like to demolish the terminal building ahead of Superblock construction. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Because homeless people are breaking into the former Greyhound Bus Station, the city would like to demolish the large terminal building ahead of Superblock construction. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Procedurally, because CHAP had deferred its authority to review the project to the Maryland Historical Trust, and thus should step aside at this point, and strategically, because the West Side desperately needs an economic boost.

A number of speakers repeated this point, saying that businesses were struggling because of the deterioration of the Superblock site, and real estate values had dropped.

Helena Hicks, who participated in the 1955 sit-in, was the only CHAP commissioner to vote against the developer’s plans for surface treatment of the Read’s property.

She said the whole building should be preserved as a civil rights landmark.

Civil Rights Educational Center

Former state Senator Julian L. Lapides bristled at the perception that preservationists had delayed and obstructed the project.

“They’re not the obstructionists,” he told the commission. “An agreement was made 10 years ago about how to proceed with historic preservation on the West Side. The preservationists have been putting in the time, been at the table, and if they [the developers] had stuck to the agreement, we would have this project [underway] today.”

Marvin L. “Doc” Cheatham, past president of the Baltimore branch of the NAACP, said the developer’s pledge to develop a display to commemorate the sit-in protest Read’s was “an insult and assuredly does not recognize this historic event.”

Cheatham called on the city to establish an “educational civil right center” at the Read’s site where classes and instruction could take place on a regular basis, and said large historic markers should be placed on the walls of the store identifying what happened at the location.

Rev. Dr. Alvin C. Hathaway, who toured the Read’s site with Rawlings-Blake on Monday, told CHAP he supported the development, but wanted the community to have a chance to develop ideas about how best to commemorate the sit-in.

He said he also planned to host a meeting with ministers, civil rights groups, labor leaders and others to determine how minorities can be included in jobs and other economic opportunities arising from the Superblock project.

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SXS2KHWUDYK5BKB4XNCCAAQDLE Gerald Neily

    The historic event of 1955 had two parts, the sit-in itself and the successful result that the entire Read’s chain was desegregated. If the location of the sit-in is to be demolished and thus no longer exist, the emphasis should shift to the outcome, which affected the entire Read’s chain and the entire city. We should therefore identify some other Read’s drugstore building somewhere else in the city that is still in a reasonable state of existence, and commemorate the event there.

    Trying to commemorate the historic 1955 sit-in while simultaneously knocking down almost everything at Howard/Lexington sends the message all too clearly that the larger priority is simply “jobs jobs jobs” at the expense of history. This is understandable. Economics is important. Howard Street has become an economic disaster in recent years. Our city has failed.

    But on the other hand, civil rights should not be seen as an afterthought. We should commemorate this historic event at a location where it can be seen that the struggle for civil rights does not take second place to demolition in the name of economic progress, but that civil rights are an important part of the very foundation upon which Baltimore’s future will be built.

    So stick a plaque on the facade and then direct people to visit the true historic commemoration somewhere else.

    • http://profiles.google.com/jamiehunt344 James Hunt

      Agreed. So, there’s an entire White Tower (complete with interior fittings) sitting on the second floor of the old City Life Museums, between a display of Pennsylvania Avenue (complete with a Royal Theater marquee) and a mural featuring a civil rights protest on Howard Street. Once located at Howard and Centre, it too was the site of sit-ins in the 1950s. City Life closed in 1997. Where was the NAACP then? Where have they been since then? AWOL, is where.  Feh on these poseurs.

  • Humanamerican


    A number of speakers repeated this point, saying that businesses were struggling because of the deterioration of the Superblock site, and real estate values had dropped.”

    This is the kind of nonsense that exacerbates our city’s continual decline. The city declares a site the future home of mega-project X. Mega-project X takes years to get approval and financing, followed by more years of community opposition. In those years, the proposed site of mega-project X deteriorates because no one wants to develop there only to be evicted by mega-project X, while the properties around the proposed site stagnate because speculation about mega-project X makes the property value too high. Then the city and developers, and even former opposition to mega-project X insist that mega-project X needs to happen without further delay because of the deterioration in the neighborhood.

    We don’t need more mega-projects in this city. We need city-wide policies that promote economic investment.

  • I chose Baltimore on purpose.

    Cheatham called on the city to establish an “educational civil right
    center” at the Read’s site where classes and instruction could take
    place on a regular basis, and said large historic markers should be
    placed on the walls of the store identifying what happened at the
    location.

    If the NAACP wants to pay for it, by all means go ahead. This sounds great. The city doesn’t have money to do this and it certainly doesn’t make sense for the developers. We, as a city, need to stop relying on the “government” to do things for us. If as many people really feel this should happen as the news makes out, they should pony up and donate to it. Otherwise, by happy with a pretty good compromise and let’s get on with the business of redeveloping a very blighted part of our great city.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

    • Yesterday, when Baltimore web developer and Ignite Baltimore co-founder Mike Subelsky tweeted that he was about to witness Nik Wallenda’s tightrope walk across the Inner Harbor, my ears perked up. Pix to come, Subelsky promised. Oooh, send them along I said! Recognizing his citizen journalist moment, Subelsky kindly agreed and sent along some great photos. [...]

Twitter

Facebook