Feedback

“Stop the flawed process,” chant opponents of mayor’s rec center plan

Spinning off youth facilities an approach "designed for failure," protesters say.

a tv cameras roll

Children from Crispus Attucks Recreation Center say what they like best about the facility as the TV cameras rolled.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

A boisterous group of 150 parents and children shook up a normally sedate gathering of the Recreation and Parks Advisory Council last night, voicing opposition to Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’s plan to privatize and shut down many recreation centers.

“We are here because once again our city is playing ‘Let’s make a deal’ with our children,” said Rev. Glenna Reed, pastor of the Church of the Holy Nativity.

“Our children are being used as pawns as the city seeks to address its budgetary shortfall. Furthermore, we’re expected to be silent and actively complicit as the future of recreation in the city is put on the auction block.”

The crowd – bused in from the Crispus Attucks, Rita Church and DeWees rec centers – burst into chants of “Don’t Close!” and “Stop the Flawed Process!” as the advisory council listened quietly and the city’s director of recreation, Bill Tyler, looked stricken.

Adding to the surreal atmosphere were Halloween cobwebs and black spiders dangling from the ceiling of the Rec and Parks meeting hall.

Under Halloween cobwebs, the BUILD crowd gathers at Rec and Park's headquarters building at Druid Hill Park. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

A crowd gathers at Rec and Parks headquarters at Druid Hill Park. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Designed for Failure

The protest was organized by BUILD (Baltimoreans United in Leadership Development), which has accused Rawlings-Blake of breaking her promise in the mayoral campaign to create 55 quality rec centers.

BUILD said her plan to spin off rec centers to community groups has been so secretive and ill-thought-out that it “appears to be designed for failure.”

“To expect a not-for-profit to have $5 million set aside for insurance – come on. To expect a not-for-profit to sustain a quality recreation program with a one-time grant of $50,000 or $100,000 – come on,” the group argued in a press release.

Rev. Reed rallies the troops during the boisterous meeting. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Rev. Reed rallies the troops at the meeting. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Recreation director Tyler has said that while the city’s goal was not to close any rec center, the result may be the closing of an undetermined number of centers if private groups are not found to run them.

Last night Tyler referred all questions about potential closings and the selection of rec center managers to the Department of Purchasing. Response to the city’s Request for Proposals (RFPs) has been disappointing, with only five parties submitting bids – and only one bidder with a track record in rec management.

Parents Rely on Centers, Too

A string of speakers last night voiced their support for rec centers, often accompanied by criticism of the city’s spending priorities.

“There’s no problem with building prisons in Baltimore,” said John Anderson. “There’s no problem with having the Grand Prix…. I’m begging the mayor, please, keep my neighborhood rec center open.”

Bill Tyler looked strickened, while Rev. Glenna Reed rallied the troops. (Photos by Mark Reutter)

Rec chief Bill Tyler listens to last night's speakers. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Regina Edwards said her family depends on the Crispus Attucks facility in Madison Park. “I can’t afford $100 or $200 a week for after-school care. The children depend on it, and the parents do as well.”

The protesters called on the advisory council to meet with Rawlings-Blake and ask her to keep all rec centers open until a better process is developed to meet the recreational needs of the city.

Carolyn Wainwright, chair of the council, expressed sympathy for their point of view, saying, “What I heard tonight is that we need these rec centers.”

But with only two members present, the council lacked a quorum and deferred action on BUILD’s request.

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • http://twitter.com/marciej marciej

    At the risk of sounding like a jerk, I don’t get why people are entitled to rec centers. There aren’t any in my neighborhood in North Baltimore for my kids. (And even if there were, I wouldn’t feel comfortable having them supervised by some strangers in a big herd anyway, frankly.) If school’s out at 3 and you work until 6 and pay $100 a week for after-school care, that’s $6.66 an hour– surely one could find a retiree or teenager to watch kids after school for less than that?

    • http://twitter.com/BadPlanner Bad Planner

      It’s not a matter of “entitled,” it’s the fact that research has shown recreation programs pay for themselves many times over in the long term by reducing costs associated with incarceration, not to mention the costs incurred by victims of crime. Unfortunately we can’t assume that all parents are going to raise their children responsibly, and both the more cost-effective and humane thing to do is provide resources to help kids avert a life of crime while they’re young and impressionable. Unfortunately, politicians see the budget in terms of how to keep it low between now and the next election, and often fail to comprehend the complex relationships between one line item and another.

      • Anonymous

        Alot of what you say is true, but also much of what marciej says is true.
        What I believe could make the most difference in a childs life and ultimate afterlife is a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. Knowing Him and learning Gods revealed word in afterschool programs which are run by committed Christian such the Christian Community Center in SWBaltimore does more to produce good, peaceful, self-controlled young people than any secular program sponsored by the state could ever do.

    • LT

      I am glad that you realize that you are a jerk.  If we have recreation centers with quality programs and activities and people who care, fewer of our children would be in “baby bookintgs”.  It is good that you can afford to pay $100 a week for afterschool care, but for most families this is not possible.  It is sad that we cannot find funding for afterschool programs or support for non-profits who can make a difference.  It is a sin that we can find the funds to arrest and see our children and family members locked up. 

      • http://twitter.com/marciej marciej

        I can’t afford to pay $100 a week either. Right now some parents in the city get the gift of free after-school care and others do not, and the city can’t afford to keep giving that gift right now. I realize that that stinks for people who relied on it, but it’s also kind of unreasonable to expect the city to provide it in multiple free-standing facilities that has to be maintained, insured, staffed and so on. It would make much more sense to shut down all of the rec centers, provide after-school care at schools and use whatever money that saves to improve recreational facilities at those schools. The kids who get in trouble are not the ones who go to the rec centers. It would make more sense safety-wise to keep *everybody* at school until a parent or guardian can pick them up. Also, the state pays for jails, not the city.

      • Mark

        If $100 a week is what afterschool care costs, than that’s what families should pay. 

        How do you explain the failure of the Waverly and Barclay rec centers, when just a block away, the YMCA build (a private non-profit) was able to raise the money, build a great thriving  facility?  There may be hope yet for our schools, but the Rec centers serve so few people and are in such disrepair, it’s just not something the City can do well enough to be worth the cost.

      • Mark

        If $100 a week is what afterschool care costs, than that’s what families should pay. 

        How do you explain the failure of the Waverly and Barclay rec centers, when just a block away, the YMCA build (a private non-profit) was able to raise the money, build a great thriving  facility?  There may be hope yet for our schools, but the Rec centers serve so few people and are in such disrepair, it’s just not something the City can do well enough to be worth the cost.

  • Tblmorgan5

    She will cut everything – recs, fire, pools, and at the same time give the real estate downtown tax breaks for 30 yrs.  It’s time to vote for someone else

  • Redwards2911

    Election time came and went. Rawlings Blake has repeatedly shown that she is really not concerned about the families and children of Baltimore City. Every time the budget needs to be balanced she says closed the recreation centers (ludicrous).  Our children deserve better and we as citizen can not stand by and let this happen. Furthermore , I was once one of the children who had the oportunity to enjoy the sevices and programs offered at the recreation centers my parents could not afford child care for 4 children. Today I am a successful business woman. I say vote her out.     If she doesn’t care about the children of Baltiomre yet approves of building more jails —–What good is she really ?

  • Agalaxytraveler

    C’mon people every citizen in Baltimore had the chance to prevent (proposed recreation centers closure)  this at the polls in September.  This a direct result when one chooses to stay during any city-state election.  Maybe the next election we (citizens of Baltimore) will not wait around for an advertisement from a radio show or for someone to suggest that go out vote, but just go and do it.

  • Anthonybubbagreen91

    Of course no one from City Hall will show up they do that to frustrate you And hope that you will go away. We lost our daughter Deanna Green at a recreation facility. This is one way the city to get out of being accountable if anything was to happen to your child. Instead of the city being proactive to To what happened to Deanna Green They want to be Reactive by closing the rec facilities. Don’t stop fighting continued to push until something happens.

  • Ktrueheart

    I couldn’t make this meeting, but know that I am thrilled to read that many residents feel the inequity of our local government’s policies seem to be slanted towards balancing the budget at the expense of providing quality programs, schools and services for our children.  We have to unite against the continuing dis-investment in our children … they deserve better!

  • Max Obuszewski

    It was great to read of the protest.  However, there was one failure on the part of the protesters.  We must always bring up the fact that the money is going to the Pentagon instead of rec centers.  The money we need in Baltimore is being diverted to invading foreign countries.  Not only are tax dollars being wasted by the Pentagon in misadventures, the soldiers coming back will be dependent on tax dollars to deal with injuries, both physical and mental.  This will be a tremendous drain on the federal budget.  Keep open rec centers, and close down all foreign military bases.

  • Idohousecallssometimes

    The money that  is available for rec centers has been designated for the “Future Of  Baltimore” this organization is also known as the Greater Baltimore Committee has no interest in your children or your needs. Their interest is to get you out  of the city and take this city as far down as it can go in order to get grant money and build it back up without the  people that need rec centers. Sheila wouldn’t play the game, but Stephanie has and will.

  • Ktrueheart

    Looking forward to attending tomorrow’s City Council hearing on Mayor Rawlings-Blakes’ DISS-Kids Recreation Plan.  Hoping for a very large turn-out!

  • May 22, 2013

    • As city firefighters face the possibility of 24-hour-long shifts to save money, Fire Chief James Clack today announced the filling of two newly-created administrative positions, each carrying annual salaries of about $100,000. In addition, Clack named Ian T. Brennan, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’s assistant press secretary, as the department’s public information officer, replacing the retiring Kevin [...]

  • May 21, 2013

    • The Board of Estimates will be asked tomorrow to make Associated Catholic Charities the new operator of the city’s homeless shelter, replacing longtime provider JHR (Jobs, Housing and Recovery), Inc. The Mayor’s Office of Human Services is asking the board to approve a one-year $2.7 million contract for ACC to run the 250-plus-bed shelter, beginning [...]

  • May 17, 2013

    • UPDATED – At his stop at a South Baltimore factory this afternoon, President Obama announced a plan to boost the economy by reducing the red tape required on large federal projects. “Sometimes it takes too long to get projects off the ground,” Obama said at Ellicott Dredges, citing permits and planning delays related to infrastructure [...]

  • May 16, 2013

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • December 10, 2012

    • We Brew-ers have been gradually getting our act together to finally give our Kickstarter contributors their Thank You mugs, bumper stickers and other rewards. On Saturday we knocked out one more of those formal thank yous in a borrowed conference room downtown. It was a “Baltimore Brew Staff Meeting.” We mostly have lower-case “staff meetings,” [...]

Twitter

Facebook