Feedback

Baltimore excuses new Grand Prix promoter from $4.25 million in fees

Mayor's office agrees to waive event and service fees for the new race promoter. New group includes two participants in the failed racing group.

srb 2:15

Mayor Rawlings-Blake speaks briefly to reporters after yesterday’s Board of Estimates meeting.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

  • Story Link
  • 23

Categories

The new Grand Prix contract may be better for taxpayers – as the Rawlings-Blake administration argued yesterday – but it is most certainly better for the promoter.

The city has dropped more than $4 million in fees that it demanded from Baltimore Racing Development, while not requiring the new promoter to pay back any of the terminated group’s debts to the city.

In effect, the city has given Downforce Racing LLC a clean financial slate, even though two of its three partners were involved in BRD, which owes the city $1.7 million.

Felix Dawson invested about $300,000 in BRD, while Dale Dillon worked as the group’s general manager. Dan Reck is the third partner. According to the mayor’s office, Dawson and Dillon were not “managing partners or executives” at BRD, hence are not responsible for its debts.

Downforce Racing was formed last Wednesday by Baltimore attorney James B. Astrachan, according to the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation.

Downforce Racing has no website, and there is little public information about the group.

“Best Interests of the City”

Yesterday, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake praised the new contract as a great opportunity for the city to continue hosting the race without risking taxpayers’ money.

“It’s in the best interest for our local economy and the best interest of the city that we move forward, but not move forward with any risk to taxpayers,” she said in brief remarks after the weekly Board of Estimates meeting.

The Grand Prix is one of the Rawlings-Blake’s signature initiatives as mayor. Following the financial collapse of BRD, she has insisted that the three-day race continue and rejected criticism by City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young that the race was a poor use of scarce city resources.

The new contact was hammered out by Deputy Mayor Kaliope Parthemos, who was closely involved in the BRD contract. In both contracts, the city was represented by Mark Pollak, a real estate attorney at Ballard Spahr, as outside counsel.

The new contract bypassed the city’s Request for Proposals process by being designated as a professional service contract. Such contracts need only be listed on the Board of Estimates agenda and considered by the board at its weekly meeting.

Event and Other Fees Waived

The new contract eliminates a number of fees that were required under the BRD contract approved by the Board of Estimates in May 2010.

Specifically, Downforce Racing will not pay an annual $250,000 event fee, a $100,000 community benefits fee, and a (up to) $500,000 yearly fee for the use of city services and manpower.

Over the five-year life of the new contract, these waived fees amount to $4.25 million.

In place of the old fee schedule, the city will place a $3.50 surcharge on each ticket sold to the 2012 race. The surcharge will increase by 25 cents a year to $4.50 in 2016.

The ticket surcharge is designed to cover half of the city’s costs, according to documents released yesterday.

City Services for the Race

This will leave roughly $350,000 a year to be absorbed by the city. These costs mostly involve overtime to be paid to city employees during the three-day race.

The city will provide the following services to Downforce, according to the new contract:

• adequate police security “inside the race track area and outside of the track area to maintain public safety at all times during the event period.”
• “adequate fire and safety personnel and equipment, including EMS personnel, inside the race track area.”
• personnel to handle car traffic to and from the event, which attracted 160,000 visitors last September.
• free delivery and pick up of “an adequate number of roll-on, roll-off dumpsters” as requested by the race promoters.
• three street-sweeping units to clean the race route during the event period.

Another major difference between the two contracts is that the new ticket surcharge will be placed at the time of sale in a “lock-box” escrow account controlled by the city and meant to ensure that the government gets paid.

The escrow account will also hold the city’s 10% admissions and amusement tax revenues.

The prior contract let Baltimore Racing Development collect the admissions tax, with the understanding that the tax would be paid to the city after the event. BRD’s failure to pay the admissions tax – as well as the event and city service fees – led to the city’s decision to terminate its contract on December 29.

Another key proviso would allow Downforce Racing to change up to 50% of its ownership interest without city approval (but not allow a change of the current three participants).

And finally, the contract permits Dale Dillon to receive a yearly salary of up to $600,000 to provide “construction, management and promotional services.”

Only Bidder with “Demonstrated Ability”

The city terminated its agreement with BRD on Dec. 30. Parthemos then began negotiations to find a new promoter in time to prepare for the next race scheduled for Labor Day weekend.

Yesterday, some details of the negotiations were disclosed. The mayor’s office said that in addition to Downforce, it received proposals from O’Neil Motorsports, North American Motorsports Events and City Challenge.

O’Neil Motorsports was organized by Gregory O’Neil and Sharon Grinnell, both certified minority contractors in Maryland. Grinnell was a former official at the Baltimore Development Corp. (BDC), and O’Neil is a demolition contractor who said he was involved in Formula 1 racing.

North American Motorsports was controlled by Geoffrey Whaling, former head of tourism for the city of Toronto, and City Challenge was run by Hartmut Beyer, a German racing entrepreneur.

“None of the proposals demonstrated the ability to secure an IndyCar sanction agreement required for the race,” the city said. As a result, Parthemos and Pollak negotiated exclusively with Downforce.

The city has praised Dale Dillon as a well-regarded and experienced operator who had led Grand Prix races in St. Petersburg and Toronto as well as the first Baltimore Grand Prix. He lives in Indianapolis where he is closely associated with IndyCar races.

Felix Dawson and Dan Reck are founding partners of Baltimore-based Wilkes Lane Capital LLC and are former executives at Constellation Energy.

Incorporated last October, Wilkes Lane Capital focuses on private investing in the energy sector. Its website is under construction, with no information available.

According to the city, the three partners have been vetted and shown to have the financial resources to organize the race.

Waiting for a Sponsor

One of the early warning signs that Baltimore Racing Development was in difficulty last winter was its inability to secure a title sponsor. Yesterday, the city said that Downforce Racing has not yet struck a deal with a lead sponsor.

The city anticipates that a sponsor will be secured after the contract is passed next Wednesday by the Board of Estimates, which must formally approved the agreement.

Mayor Rawlings-Blake sits on the spending board and controls three of the five seats. The other two members are City Council President Young and City Comptroller Joan Pratt.

A spokesman for Young said he would vote “no” on the contract. Pratt has not disclosed her views.

On another matter that caused consternation after the September race, the mayor’s office said it would work with the new promoter and IndyCar to replace the 18 trees that were cut down for the 2011 race and not replaced.

Community activists say about 39 trees were chopped down to permit better viewing from the racing stands.

Baltimore Brew is a moderated site that encourages the free and open exchange of ideas in a climate of mutual respect. We reserve the right - but do not assume any obligation - to delete or withhold the publication of comments that violate our standards. Comments that are obscene, libelous or defamatory, or include vicious personal attacks will not be published. Racist remarks, sexist remarks, disgusting stuff, blatant commercial self-promotion – you get the idea – if it crosses our line, we’re not going to run it.

  • westside resident

    Panem et circenses 

  • http://www.RyanSelvy.com/ Ryan Selvy

    I won’t lie. Initially when I read the title and first few paragraphs I was incredibly disappointed. However, after reading the entire article I have faith the city is really onto something. Even though the $4.25 million dollars are lost, at least these plans prevent anything like this to happen again. Yes, I would like to see that $4.25 million paid but unfortunately I don’t think it’s a possibility.

  • JS

    Quidquid id est, timeo BRD et dona ferentes.

  • Unellu

    Dear Brew,
    I don’t need clowns,
    I don’t need sitcoms,
    I don’t need Jon Stewart–
    Or Stephen Colbert–
    their humor–
    cleverly contrived
    to look “un”contrived
    so the worshipful mobs
    will set them up
    as the masters of irony-
    and tout that we have before us–
    an incomparable pair of jesters-
    whose acts we must lap up
    like cats will- milk from saucers–
    to be up with the times–
    no, I don’t need those poseurs–
    when I have you BREW–
    reporting serious news from Baltimore–
    and absent any effort at lofty lampoons–
    you make me laugh out loud–
    at the antics of your subjects–
    Charm City’s movers and shakers–
    Emperors without clothes!

    Usha Nellore

     
     

  • Baltimoreplaces

    You can’t get the right answer if you don’t ask the right question.  I am very interested in what the long term vision for this city is, its mission statement.  Is it to be a play ground for tourists and conventioneers and/or a viable 21st Century to live, work, play city?  I don’t see cohesive long range plan, just bits and pieces that aren’t linked.  Thoughtful planning and design have not been Baltimore’s forte for decades.  I want to understand how the Grad Prix, the new arena, and casino fit in to the long term vision for the city.  Other cities are having much greater success by creating world class parks, sustainable and thoughtful design and quality of life enhancements.  The Mayor says she want more people to move to the city… so they can pay to go to the Grad Prix, take bus to the casino, go to conventions?

  • mc2012

    Shameful, the whole thing.

    “Adequate police security [...] to maintain public safety at all times.”  ”Street Sweeping”

    Wish we had that in my neighborhood.

  • Unellu

    Baltimoreplaces,
    You are too sensible for this city.  Logic is not what moves the place.

  • GlenW

    Baltimore City Council: The blind leading the stupid

  • Jreyesko

    Just roll over and do-me SRB. This is NOT in the best interest of Baltimore City. I can not believe you did this.

  • Andrew

    Driving Baltimore’s tourism industry is a huge first step towards attracting new businesses, and therefore more tax paying citizens.   The unfortunate reality is that no matter how poor the conditions of some of this great city’s neighborhoods and schools are, repairing them and creating sustainable growth will only be possible when scalable resources are available.  Granted, one could argue that the resources are available now, but sustainability is the key factor.  We could fix schools today, but if the surrounding communities are not prepared to support the investment, we will end up spending much more money fixing what will be the new problem of trying to protect such an investment (better schools won’t correlate with less crime unless the socio-economics of the entire neighborhood shift).  Bottom line, if we can leverage the growth of the Grand Prix as a pillar of our growth strategy, Baltimore will become a much more attractive place to live, work and play—with new tax paying tourists, citizens and businesses, we can afford to fix broken schools and create safe surrounding environments.

    • Gerald Neily

      Here’s a sentence by sentence translation of Andrew’s comment into English:

      “Driving Baltimore’s tourism industry is a huge first step towards attracting new businesses, and therefore more tax paying citizens.” TRANSLATION: Tourism is our last resort for creating a functioning city economy.

      “The unfortunate reality is that no matter how poor the conditions of some of this great city’s neighborhoods and schools are, repairing them and creating sustainable growth will only be possible when scalable resources are available.” TRANSLATION: Our tax base is shot.

      “Granted, one could argue that the resources are available now, but sustainability is the key factor. We could fix schools today, but if the surrounding communities are not prepared to support the investment, we will end up spending much more money fixing what will be the new problem of trying to protect such an investment (better schools won’t correlate with less crime unless the socio-economics of the entire neighborhood shift).” TRANSLATION: The money is there to fix the city now, but then it would just go downhill again.The neighborhoods are so crummy, the schools are not worth trying to save.

      “Bottom line, if we can leverage the growth of the Grand Prix as a pillar of our growth strategy, Baltimore will become a much more attractive place to live, work and play—with new tax paying tourists, citizens and businesses, we can afford to fix broken schools and create safe surrounding environments.” TRANSLATION: “Hey, this Grand Prix is cool; let’s move into the city, get a job and put our kids in the public schools.”

      Cue the sustainable scalable leveraged laugh track.

  • Andrew

    Gerald, sadly it seems that our city is at that point.  The conditions are that bad that we don’t have many options left.  I’d love to hear your thoughts on some better solutions.

  • andrew

    Andrew, take a trip to Harrisburg, Pa., and check out all the success they’ve had with driving tourists to their city. The (now ex-) mayor of Harrisburg spent millions opening a Civil War museum, buying a baseball team (yes, the city owns it), and buying artifacts for another museum which never opened. Today, Harrisburg is, well, a pretty terrible place where nobody wants to live. It’s close to Baltimore, and I suggest a day trip there sometime. You will instantly understand why this type of investment is more of a cancer than it is a cure for a problem. 

    A city can only go so far pumping money into these types of projects. If one believes the “big tourist projects drive people to move to a place” mantra, we’d have seen some gains in population by now considering the immense reprogramming that’s happened downtown using public money (in the forms of grants, subsidies and tax breaks.  The Inner Harbor, the stadiums, the new downtown have all failed to deliver on promises made by those past leaders who considered themselves sages of city development.  Meanwhile, the rest of the city crumbled, the city coffers are empty and people moved to White Marsh. One continues to wonder why those leaders don’t seem to notice that their plans never really work.

    I think a fresh approach — I cringe even calling it that — of looking at the actual neighborhoods is really needed around here. Baltimore is not on the ropes, yet, but it will soon be if we don’t think about things in a different way than we have in the past. 

    • http://profiles.google.com/jamiehunt344 James Hunt

      “I think a fresh approach — I cringe even calling it that — of looking at the actual neighborhoods is really needed around here. Baltimore is not on the ropes, yet, but it will soon be if we don’t think about things in a different way than we have in the past.”

      +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

      Which “past” are you talking about? Baltimore City has pumped hundreds of millions into neighborhoods such as Upton and Park Heights and Cherry Hill. Been over to Gay Street lately? That got a multi-million dollar makeover into the Oldtown Mall following the riots of ’68. Looks today like the riots just hit it.

      Every commercial strip — York Road, Belair Road, Reisterstown Road, etc. — and the neighborhoods around them have had money dumped into them at one time or another. Many have gotten several infusions over the past 30 years. Not that you could tell, considering the condition of many of those places today.

      The “put money into neighborhoods” line is a canard. It’s been done, and it only works if the “neighbors” have any interest in contributing to the well-being of their neighborhood. Too many don’t, and all the city boodle in the world won’t change that.

      Feel free to whine about the Inner Harbor all you want, but those of us who watched it being built — and know what it replaced — know that this city would be Detroit or Newark if the harbor had been left to rot.

      • Gerald Neily

        My proposed “neighborhood strategy” would be fundamentally different from those that failed in the past. The four target neighborhoods in my previous Brew article were identified based on the fact that all they essentially need is smart infrastructure investment, NOT the kind of coordination with quality city services which the city has usually failed to provide, much as those services are needed for everyone in the entire city. Westport is a neighborhood where Patrick Turner has already created a workable plan working with the community. Franklin-Mulberry simply requires downsizing the Highway to Nowhere (NOT the city’s crazy cap-plan which has been languishing for over 40 years among other broken promises). Same with Old Town and North Carroll Park.

        Downtown Newark actually seems to be an instructive example. It has gotten lots of public investment such as an NBA arena and cultural facilities, but the biggest private investment has gone to the Jersey City/Exchange Place/Hudson Riverfront several miles away. But the Ironbound neighborhood adjacent to downtown Newark has flourished with only relatively modest public support. I don’t know a whole lot about all this, so maybe we have some Jerseyphiles who can fill us in.

  • andrew

    Fair enough. I don’t know enough about the past. Sorry for that. 
    I would like to point out that there’s a fair amount of waterfront development that’s been done over the years in Detroit, and well, it hasn’t done the wonderful things people said it would. I am not familiar with Newark. 

    • http://profiles.google.com/jamiehunt344 James Hunt

      Fair enough. I don’t know enough about the past. Sorry for that. 
      I would like to point out that there’s a fair amount of waterfront development that’s been done over the years in Detroit, and well, it hasn’t done the wonderful things people said it would. I am not familiar with Newark. ++++++++++++++++++++++The Inner Harbor development has spawned hundreds of millions — probably billions — in private-sector, tax paying development. If you have a Saturday morning free sometime, park at Canton Waterfront Park, walk the seven-mile promenade to Tide Point and realize this: almost none of this existed 40 years ago when the harbor project was started … the condos, townhouses, supermarkets, offices, museums, aquarium, harbor place, science center, parks. None of it. Canton, Fells Point, Otterbein, Federal Hill, Locust Point — city neighborhoods all — are as healthy and sought after as any neighborhood in the metro area. All because of the harbor redevelopment. Just about every city in the world with any kind of water nearby has sent representatives to see how we did it. And the taxes that development pays carries a lot of the rest of the city. Without it, we’d have incomparably worse problems today.

      • andrew

        “Without it, we’d have incomparably worse problems today.” 

        That statement is impossible to prove. And anyway, just because a few of the dozens and dozens of neighborhoods in town are nicer places now does not mean the city is better off overall. The city has lost more than a 100k residents since 1990. Twenty percent of Baltimore residents are below the poverty line. How much have those numbers been reduced due to harbor development? 1/10th of a percentage point? Maybe a 1/2 percent? How much are those gains worth to you? 

        I suppose you could look at tax receipts and say that harbor businesses and residences are bringing in tax money, but that doesn’t mean that the city resources spent to develop and maintain it could not have been put to better use somewhere else in the city and been more beneficial in the long term. 

  • andrew

    Oh, I forgot to add – my vision of “putting money in the neighborhoods” is just simply improving the services available to these neighborhoods. Let’s improve garbage pickup, sidewalks and schools. I’m not interested in having the downtown developers branch out and offer their “skills” to neighborhood development. Let people do that on their own. 

  • Cwals99

    The citizens of Baltimore need to look closely at the players in this deal.  There is something driving this deal besides benefits to the City.  This race has a proven record of failure wherever it is employed…..came at great financial cost to tax payers and small business vendors last year, and now it sounds as if some revenue as fees to the race owners has been transferred to ticket holders—-the public.  It sounds like a public private partnership designed to bring profits to the corporate players, not the public.

    • Anonymous

      BRD has a proven record of 1 failure, zero successes. Dale Dillon has organized two successful and profitable street races in the past, as well as salvaging the Baltimore race last year in the last 3 weeks to keep it from becoming a complete disaster and losing all its money. He has a track record of success, why not bet on him? Why not make the reasonable assumption that BRD simply didn’t know what they were doing and weren’t up to the task?

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

    • Yesterday, when Baltimore web developer and Ignite Baltimore co-founder Mike Subelsky tweeted that he was about to witness Nik Wallenda’s tightrope walk across the Inner Harbor, my ears perked up. Pix to come, Subelsky promised. Oooh, send them along I said! Recognizing his citizen journalist moment, Subelsky kindly agreed and sent along some great photos. [...]

Twitter

Facebook