Feedback

Demolition by neglect? Collapsed roof on Read’s building won’t be fixed for months

City says building is not in imminent danger of collapsing despite severe moisture damage.

reads drugstore

Why are windows hanging open at the city-owned Read’s building, site of a historic civil rights sit-in?

Photo by: Fern Shen

Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake has vowed to preserve the facade of the Read’s Drug Store on downtown’s west side and commemorate its role in the civil rights movement, but the city-owned building won’t get preservation love for many more months.

Most of the roof has collapsed and the floor joists have rotted from widespread moisture damage. Contractors aren’t expected, however, to install a temporary rubber “membrane” to seal the roof until late spring or, more likely, summer. 

That’s because the work is being done under a standard city contract. This process requires months to prepare the contract, advertise for bids and slowly wind its way to the Board of Estimates for approval.

(UPDATE: Getting a roof on Read’s is going to be slower than we thought. Alfred H. Foxx, city director of public works, and an aide told us today that bid contracts typically take nine months to be processed and awarded. The Read’s bid is scheduled to be advertised next month, which would push back the roof contract’s approval by the BOE to fall 2012.)

Right now, the building smells. The musty odor of mold wafts out of a gap where swollen plywood boards cover the first-floor window and a former entrance on Howard Street.

Bricks in some places are water-stained with rusty orange streaks. At least three of the upper-story windows were found hanging open on a recent frosty January day.

Phew! Mold vapors were wafting out on the Howard St. side of the Read's building. (Photo by Fern Shen)

Phew! Mold vapors were wafting out on the Howard St. side of the Read's building a few days ago. (Photo by Fern Shen)

The mold smell is not surprising considering the assessment in a recent engineering consultant’s report that 80% of the building’s roof has failed.

All of the wood-framed floor levels, from the mezzanine to top floor, have caved in and are otherwise damaged by “long-term exposure to the elements,” the report said.

The interior is so hazardous that the consultant was not given access to the inside. Instead, his evaluation was based on photographs and a visual inspection of the building’s exterior.

No “Imminent Danger”

Despite such damage, the Commission for Historical and Architectural Preservation (CHAP) was told last month that the structure was not in imminent danger of collapse because its outer brick walls “appear to be in fair condition” and its steel-beam framing is “in fair to good condition and stable.”

“We don’t want the building to fall down,” CHAP commissioner Robert C. Embry warned officials from the Baltimore Development Corp. (BDC), which manages the site for the city.

Larry Gibson, another member of the preservation panel who spoke at the meeting, described the current state of the building as “an absolute, complete case of demolition by neglect.”

Lexington Street “Virtually Abandoned”

Tyler Gearhart, executive director of Preservation Maryland, said stabilization “should be done immediately” by the city rather than letting the building deteriorate through another winter.

Read’s is part of the so-called “Superblock” where a city-backed $150 million apartment-retail project has been the subject of legal disputes for the last six years. In his presentation to the panel, M.J. “Jay” Brodie, president of the BDC, blamed the lawsuits for tying the city’s hands.

Gearhart disagreed, saying the city is using the lawsuits as a cover to disguise its own mismanagement of the site.

“The city condemned and acquired Read’s and other historic buildings in the Superblock, leaving them vacant and Lexington Street virtually abandoned,” Gearhart said yesterday.

“Regrettably, the selected developer has yet to produce a viable plan and the block continues to be demolished by neglect.”

At its last meeting, the Board of Estimates unanimously approved extending the city’s land disposition agreement with Lexington Square Partners, Superblock’s developers, from Dec. 31, 2011 to April 30, 2012.

Preservation and Civil Rights Battles

Read’s has also been the subject of controversy because of its unique social history. A 1955 sit-in by Morgan State students eventually forced the drugstore chain to desegregate its lunch counters.

The demonstration is considered one of the earliest national examples of a peaceful civil rights sit-in and a seminal moment for Baltimore’s black community.

The developer’s original plan to demolish the building brought protests by some of the original participants in the action, as well as students and others.

Last May, Rawlings-Blake brokered a plan by which the two outer walls of the building would be preserved (except for the ground floor, which would be redesigned to meet shopping-mall-type display standards).

Several windows on the Reads building are open to the elements right now. (Photo by Fern Shen)

Several windows on the Read's building are open to the elements. (Photo by Fern Shen)

The proposal was approved by CHAP, but not without vocal opposition by preservationists like Gearhart, who said it violated a 2001 agreement between the city and Maryland Historical Trust, and Helena Hicks, a CHAP commissioner who participated in the 1955 sit-in.

In November, the mayor appointed a committee of religious leaders, academics and others to develop a plan for commemorating the sit-in.

The absence of civil rights activists on the committee prompted criticism by Hicks and others that their proposals for honoring the site were being ignored.

The committee’s report was handed over to the Mayor on Dec. 6.  The Brew has repeatedly requested a copy of the report, but it has not been released or publicly discussed by the mayor or her staff.

The former Read's drugstore building, January 2012. (Photo by Fern Shen)

The building at Lexington and Howard streets – once the busiest retail corner of Baltimore – seen last Saturday. (Photo by Fern Shen)

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • EJD1984

    Careful. I can see the city playing the same shenanigans  that was pulled on the Grand Theater in Highlandtown.
    Act 1:
    Don’t worry, we’re going to save the Grand and incorporate it into the new library.
    Act 2:
    Our structural engineers have determined that only the facade of the theater can be saved, but will (again) incorporate it into the new library.
    Act3:
    We’ve finally determined that nothing of the theater can be saved, and will have to be (quickly) torn down (before the preservationist can try to save it)
    Epilogue:
    We (the city) will now quickly build the new library that needed no further design changes, and clearly showing that there was NEVER an intention of incorporating the Grand Theater into the new structure.

    I can see the same exact chain of events happening with the Read’s Drug Store building.

    • Just sayin’

      Sounds like Memorial Stadium!

    • GlenW

      However, such tactics are appropriate in this case. The building has been remodelled over the years, and the lunch counter where the sit-in took place was torn out in the early 70′s! Few even knew a sit-in happened there until last year, when it was already too late to save anything. Tear the godam building down, and get on with the superblock. Be sure to include the best possible tribute to the events that happened in 1955, but forget about saving the facade.

  • Ktrueheart

    Historic preservation of BMore’s historic African American sites has NOT been of importance to our new Mayor.  Reads Drug Store falls into the same state of neglect as the historic Mt. Auburn Cemetery.  This administration does NOT care about Black History and won’t spend a dime to preserve these relics unless they can break a piece off for a big developer campaign contributor in the process … stay tuned, so when’s the next election???

  • JS

    Oh dear, I want to correct myself.  I meant to say*Bailey* Pope, who is one of the architects for the Dawson Company.

    Read’s wasn’t the only place in that area that was the site of protests against segregation. The whole “Superblock” area was important in early civil rights history.  A few plaques does not replace a priceless heritage.

  • westside resident

    What is clear is that something must be done and the city leadership, BDC, developers and preservationists seems incapable of coming to a solution that benefits the residents of this area of the city. The status quo is not acceptable. The citizens and business people of Baltimore deserve clear and decisive leadership that is willing to compromise while pushing to get things accomplished. 

    That being said some quick questions/comments:
    1. Where were the preservationists and those interested in preserving the history of the Civil Rights movement for the DECADES that the building sat and rotted?
    2. What are the costs and benefits of preserving this building? What compromises have been offered by the developer? It was my understanding that the developers have accommodated (reasonable) preservationist’s requests.
    3. No developer would begin construction with lawsuits pending. Mr. Brodie is absolutely correct that lawsuits are the primary reason for the hold of a ground breaking.
    4. Isn’t this just yet another example of the city government getting into the development business? Aren’t there more pressing concerns that the city government should be worried about (i.e. curbing violent crime, improving school performance, etc.)?

  • Curtis

    Replace the roof on a building that’s going to get a facadectomy.  Yeah, that’s a good use of tax dollars!!!  Before throwing a temper tantrum on insensitivity, remember that there’s nothing to protect but the walls.  The original Read’s interior was removed decades ago.  The brick walls aren’t in danger of crumbling anytime soon and, even better, they shouldn’t be load bearing.      

    • http://profile.yahoo.com/WASPAAVSZFUOKCT2GFFQXFWIKI Rob

      Walls are gravity load-bearing. (4) four interior steel columns have girders branch out to engaged brick columns, which extend down to an interesting steel framing system below. Replacing the roof is critical.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • March 24, 2014

    • Last Thursday, I sent an email to the Mayor’s Office of Communications asking for some basic responsiveness: Please return our emailed queries and phone calls about stories. Please send us the same routine emails you send to other members of the media. Lately, more so than usual, they haven’t been. It’s a shame because, even [...]

Twitter

Facebook