Inside City Hall: BDC hit for “lack of transparency”

stokes meeting irene van sant

Irene Van Sant at today’s City Hall meeting. From left: Councilman Carl Stokes, Council President Jack Young, Councilman William H. Cole, Councilman Edward Reisinger and chief of bureau of treasury management Steve Kraus.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

Three City Council members took turns today swinging at the Baltimore Development Corp. (BDC) for its lack of transparency.

This isn’t the first time the city’s development arm has been criticized for its closed meetings and lack of timely disclosure – Occupy Baltimore staged a demonstration in front of its downtown offices over these very issues last November.

But today’s meeting between Irene Van Sant, BDC senior project manager, and the Council’s taxation, finance and economic development committee marked a heightened insistence by some Council members that the agency change its ways.

“We want more disclosure sooner,” Carl Stokes, chairman of the committee, told Van Sant. “And more than sooner, to have full disclosure.”

Stokes said that the present system in which the BDC privately makes recommendations to the mayor about tax incentives to developers, then presents the incentives as a fait accompli requiring urgent Council approval has to stop.

“We cannot do our due diligence when you do this,” Stokes said.

Councilman James B. Kraft was more explicit. “The minute the developer asks for money from the city or some concession from the city, they open themselves up for disclosure,” he said.

The BDC provides sparse information about its monthly public meeting. At this meeting, a $41-million PILOT tax break was discussed – after the meeting was placed in closed session. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

The BDC provides sparse information about its monthly public meeting. At this meeting, a $41-million PILOT tax break was discussed – after the meeting was closed to the public and media. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

Councilman Bill Henry endorsed the need for more information from the agency, while Councilman William H. Cole IV cautioned that it was important for developers to be able to engage in discussions with city officials that are “not discoverable.”

Perception of Favoritism

The BDC favors two types of property tax breaks, PILOTs (payments in lieu of taxes) and TIFs (tax increment financing), as incentives for private development.

These “tools” are used only when the BDC determines that the breaks are needed to make a development project happen – known as the “but for” rule.

Kraft said there was a “perception of favoritism” in the awarding of PILOTs and TIFs that could be cleared up if the “BDC [wasn’t] so reluctant to disclose anything.”

Van Sant did not commit the agency to any of the suggestions today, saying several times, “We will consider that.”

“We try very hard to be transparent,” she said in defense, but “there’s a line between confidentiality and the public’s right to know.”

The BDC never automatically agrees to a tax incentive proposed by a developer, she told the committee. Instead, the staff does a thorough analysis of the project that may take weeks or sometimes months.

The analysis is then reviewed by the project review committee, which makes recommendations to the BDC’s board, and the board recommends a course of action to the mayor.

Exempts Itself from Open Meetings Act

Van Sant said the BDC holds public meetings, which brought a swift response from Stokes that the agency “goes into private sessions” whenever it discusses its recommendations to the mayor.

The BDC closes its public meetings by invoking an exemption to Maryland’s Open Meetings Act when discussing material that involves financial matters whose disclosure may hurt the parties involved.

Typically the BDC board has a public meeting, then votes to go into closed session and asks the  media and public to leave the meeting room.

Van Sant told Stokes that “we would have wasted your time” by, for example, publicly disclosing a proposed $41-million PILOT tax break for an Exelon building downtown when the deal was rendered moot a few days later by Exelon’s decision to locate at Harbor Point.

The city’s developer tax policies were studied last year by a 15-member task force appointed by Stokes. Today several members offered reasons why the BDC should become more transparent.

Linda Loubert, an economics professor at Morgan State University, said, “For a city like Baltimore needing to have growth, if this good boys club was more open and more transparent, more good things could happen in the city.”

Wendy Blair, head of W.L. Blair Development, argued that the city should establish an independent advisory board to monitor taxpayer-subsidized developments and provide cost/benefits analyses. “We need to evaluate how successful we’ve been,” she said.

Stokes said the committee would hold another working session to develop a consensus of how to improve the overall performance of the tax program and prepare legislation for the City Council.

Neither BDC President M.J. “Jay” Brodie nor members of the mayor’s development staff were present at today’s meeting.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • Chris Merriam

    What if the government got out of the business of subsidizing business altogether?

    • Mair

      That would certainly bring an end to all of this ‘leveling the playing field’ nonsense.

  • Iam Gayle
  • PCCP


    my experience has been that there is no language in the contract book about a bid being defective/non-responsive if a subcontractor is not in good standing with the state taxation.  maybe this has changed, but this has been something that they have only recently at prebid meetings. a contract will not be awarded to a prime if they use a sub who is not in good standing until they come into good standing, or allow a substitute as it seems that is an acceptable practice per M.E.

  • Suave

    i am so grateful they have decided not to waste our time.  or presumably theirs.

  • Parent

    These “tools” are used only when the BDC determines that the breaks are needed to make a development project happen – known as the “but for” rule.

    I’m sure there are thousands of people who would move into the city and fix up old homes “but for” the insanely high taxes.  Will the BDC give them tax breaks? 

  • James

    Not surprising Bill cole is more interested in protecting developers’ privacy than in due diligence and transparency. pretty sure his ‘negotiations’ w/ former BGP developers would make the FBI’s hair stand on end. He’s confused though.  There is a difference between ‘disclosure’ and information being ‘discoverable’ & I think he falls into the typical city council member ‘not too bright’ catgory alla Reisinger 

  • February 12, 2016

  • February 11, 2016

    • What makes a good park bench? The same elements the Roman architect Vitruvius found in all good design: Firmness, Commodity and Delight. What’s the difference between a good park bench and a great park bench? That’s a question Kevin Plank’s Sagamore Development Co. wants to explore as it seeks to create a world-class waterfront environment […]

  • February 10, 2016

    • Arguing that a trash-burning power plant proposed for South Baltimore would violate the federal Clean Air Act – and that its permit expired nine months ago – two groups are suing the New York-based company developing it. The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) and United Workers today notified Energy Answers that they intend to file a […]

  • February 9, 2016

    • Some political candidates use Apple products to write their position papers and email their staff. Northeast Baltimore’s Rodney C. Burris dangled a couple of the trendy devices in front of potential contributors as a way of raising cash. In return for a contribution of $10, contributors get a chance to win an Apple Watch or […]

  • February 6, 2016

    • Emergency repairs to a 20-inch main will result in temporary water shutoffs to about 450 houses in the Canton area on either Monday or Wednesday. Service will be interrupted at 165 houses on Monday starting at 8 a.m. and ending about 4 p.m. The affected properties will be on Montford between Foster and Fait, Fait […]

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • December 15, 2014

    •   “Ha ha, so not a surprise.” “Shocking…not!!” We get applause but also the occasional eye-roll these days for our accountability reporting – like last week’s piece about how tax cuts promised by the mayor as a selling point for Horseshoe Baltimore probably won’t happen, thanks to the casino’s lower-than-expected revenues. We get where the […]