Feedback

Inside City Hall: Monumental EWOs for Monumental Paving

Contract price has risen by 850% thanks to a profusion of extra work orders.

monumental paving

A Monumental Paving excavator works on a broken storm-drain that flooded the basement of the Walters Art Museum last year.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

For those wondering how Baltimore contractors are making out in the EWO (“extra work order”) Department, rest assured – the Bureau of Water and Wastewater is keeping the tap flowing on the controversial practice.

Just this week, for example, the Board of Estimates approved the water bureau’s request to bundle $628,248.27 worth of EWOs onto a contract awarded to Monumental Paving & Excavating Inc. back in 2010.

The latest action means that Monumental’s contract has soared 850% above the original award – from $453,076 to $3,854,658, according to records reviewed by The Brew.

Urgent Needs Work

The increases were the result of “urgent needs work” performed by the contractor to repair storm drains at Hilton Street, Edgevale Road and Inglewood Ave., as well as a ruptured drain system under Cathedral Street that flooded the basement of the Walters Art Museum in September 2011.

The contract (SWC 7761) was won through competitive bidding by Monumental on June 16, 2010. Between that date and the contract’s expiration on January 24, 2012, the water bureau used the contract to ask Monumental to perform emergency work, then bill its costs as EWOs.

This practice has been criticized by Arnold M. Jolivet, managing director of the Maryland Minority Contractors Association, as “an illegal mechanism” to circumvent the City Charter calling for competitive bidding on contracts over $25,000.

Rudolph Chow, chief of the water bureau, has defended the practice as essential to ensuring public safety when emergency repairs are needed on the city’s aging water and sewer system.

In June 2011, City Auditor Robert McCarty called on the water bureau to limit the practice of EWOs as much as possible after they added $9 million to another water contract. The auditor’s office has not actively pursued the matter since then.

Generous Contributor

Even though the Monumental contract expired last January 24, the city kept paying EWOs for Monument’s prior extra work. The latest round of payments “was delayed by revisions during the administrative review process,” according to the Board of Estimates agenda.

Comprised of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young, City Comptroller Joan Pratt, City Solicitor George Nilson and Public Works Director Alfred H. Foxx – the board approved the payment unanimously as part of a blanket approval of more than 50 city contracts.

George P. Mahoney Jr., owner of Monumental Paving, is a longtime giver to local Democratic officeholders. In the 2011 election cycle, he gave the maximum individual donation of $4,000 to Mayor Rawlings-Blake and $1,500 to City Council President Young.

EWO awarded to Harrington

The board also approved yesterday an EWO to another politically prominent contractor, Robert Harrington of R.E. Harrington Plumbing, Heating & Utility Inc.

A Harrington company truck displays a water contract that was awarded in the era of former Mayor Sheila Dixon. The crew was repairing a fire hydrant at Calvert and 27th streets last July. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

A Harrington truck displays a water contract awarded under former Mayor Sheila Dixon. Though listed as “completion Fall 2010,” a crew was seen installing a new fire hydrant at Calvert and 27th streets in July 2012. (Photo by Mark Reutter)

The award of $104,600 was the 25th EWO on a contract awarded to Harrington in October 2010 for the installation of fire hydrants and other “water appurtenances.”

These EWOs have increased the cost of this contract from $4,997,010 to $6,597,562, or over 130%. The Harrington firm contributed the maximum $4,000 to Rawlings-Blake in her 2011 election campaign.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • Pecan Squall

     Really? WTF… Everything in Baltimore points to corruption. At this point it’s par for the course.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/TMPCXP5O5YFVQOX672CSIORZ7I Jonathan

    To play devil’s advocate, while it does seem suspect for the city to be giving such large contracts to a few select companies who have been political donors, would going through a competitive bidding process really be a better alternative?  City government can be a bureaucratic nightmare. If there’s a water main break on a major street, and there have been a lot of them recently, it needs to be fixed  quickly and by someone who knows what they’re doing. As a city taxpayer, I’d rather pay a company with a proven track record and familiarity with the infrastructure than a company who can offer to do the work on the cheap.

    If the companies in question are ripping the city off by doing shoddy work or overcharging for work that wasn’t really done, that’s a different story. But that’s not made clear in the article.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • March 24, 2014

    • Last Thursday, I sent an email to the Mayor’s Office of Communications asking for some basic responsiveness: Please return our emailed queries and phone calls about stories. Please send us the same routine emails you send to other members of the media. Lately, more so than usual, they haven’t been. It’s a shame because, even [...]

Twitter

Facebook