Feedback

First audit in 25 years of Rec and Parks Department may happen this summer

Comptroller Pratt says more money is needed to conduct audits of other agencies.

audit best practices

A working session of the City Council’s taxation committee heard a progress report from auditor Robert McCarty (far right corner) today.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

Robert L. McCarty, the city auditor, gave mid-summer 2013 as the rough date when a long-sought-after audit of the Recreation and Parks Department would be completed.

The agency has not been audited for at least 25 years, said Councilman Carl Stokes, who chaired a working session of the Council’s taxation, finance and economic development committee, which heard from McCarty today.

Efforts to audit Rec and Parks got underway last spring, but have been stymied by the absence of “auditable” records – such as balance sheets, payables and receivables – according to McCarty.

At the request of Stokes and Councilwoman Rochelle “Rikki” Spector, the Department of Finance provided those records two weeks ago. They are now under review for completeness by McCarty’s office.

If there is enough data – and McCarty told The Brew after the meeting that the records “appear okay” – the audit will begin.

Pratt: More Auditors Needed

City Comptroller Joan Pratt, who oversees McCarty’s office, confirmed that she has enough money to perform the parks audit. But she warned that her office will not be able to fulfill its charter requirement to audit other agencies without supplemental funds.

Last November, voters approved an amendment to the city charter calling for 13 agencies, including police, fire, public works and housing, to be audited every fourth year beginning in 2014.

“We need financial resources,” Pratt said. “We won’t do anything until [there is] more funding.” The comptroller’s office is planning to seek a supplemental appropriation of about $700,00 this year, and will request $2.2 million in fiscal 2014 to hire 28 new auditors and supporting staff.

Mayor’s Office: Cool to Audits

Such funds would require the approval of Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, who has opposed efforts to vigorously audit city agencies.

Her reluctance was signaled today when Henry J. Raymond, deputy director of finance, told the committee he wanted to go on record that all supplemental funding “should go through the budgetary process” that is controlled by the mayor.

Last summer, the mayor’s lobbyists engineered the defeat of a Stokes-introduced bill that would require yearly audits of all city departments and boards. After much controversy, a watered-down bill was passed by the Council and then overwhelmingly approved by city voters.

Councilwoman Spector said she hoped the Rec and Parks audit would set a pattern for future audits.

Several participants said the audits should not only pay for themselves, but save taxpayers millions of dollars by pinpointing waste in city government.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • bmoreguy

    We need more money to find money?  Sounds like this is off to a great start!

  • bmorepanic

    Good luck Gennady!   I believe Mr. Schwartz personally refused to turn over financial records to the city council because a lot of their capital spending goes through a quasi-public foundation instead of the city.

    I wonder if the auditors will get to finally see those books and/or look at what the grant monies are actually spent on … 

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • March 24, 2014

    • Last Thursday, I sent an email to the Mayor’s Office of Communications asking for some basic responsiveness: Please return our emailed queries and phone calls about stories. Please send us the same routine emails you send to other members of the media. Lately, more so than usual, they haven’t been. It’s a shame because, even [...]

Twitter

Facebook