Feedback

Exclusive: City to permit Inner Harbor protests, leafleting in landmark settlement

Permits will no longer be needed for small-group protests at the Inner Harbor. Areas for leafleting greatly expanded to settle 10-year-old federal suit.

women  in black baltimore october 2009

The suit started after police broke up a 2003 vigil by Women in Black at the Inner Harbor. Here the group protests at McKeldin Square in 2009.

Photo by: womeninblack.org

Hailed by plaintiffs as a striking advance for free speech in Baltimore, a 10-year-old lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union has been settled by the Rawlings-Blake administration.

The city has agreed to a consent decree that will make sweeping changes to the confusing and restrictive rules requiring permits for persons or groups seeking to protest or leaflet at city parks.

The ACLU has long contended that the rules, especially those governing leafleting and demonstrations at the Inner Harbor, violated First Amendment free-speech guarantees.

The consent decree was signed last week by U.S. District Judge J. Frederick Motz without fanfare.

It will be presented this morning to the Board of Estimates as part of a $98,000 settlement with the ACLU. As the winning party in a civil rights case, the ACLU is eligible for attorney fees resulting from the suit.

“This has been a long time coming,” ACLU of Maryland’s senior attorney David Rocah said yesterday, releasing the consent decree to The Brew. George Nilson, the city solicitor, confirmed the settlement last night.

For years, Rocah has been negotiating with the city to change its rules governing political protests – and the police’s handling of persons seeking to express their political views near the tourist attractions and Harborplace pavilions downtown.

The suit was originally filed on behalf of Women in Black, a peace group that had been harassed by police for not having a permit for their vigil at McKeldin Plaza.

“It Was Not Right”

Betsy Cunningham, the lead plaintiff, said she and other members of the group were told by police on April 4, 2003 that they had to leave McKeldin Square because they had not obtained a permit from the city.

“We were really taken aback by their attitude. It was not fair and it was not right,” she said in an interview yesterday.

So Cunningham and four others – Terry Dalsemer, Katharine LeVeque, Barbara Pula and the late Francis Finney – filed suit in U.S. District Court, alleging that the city’s requirement that they apply and pay for a permit was an unconstitutional infringement of their First Amendment rights.

The ACLU and city have bickered over the lawsuit since the Martin O’Malley administration, coming close to an agreement several times.

The consent decree finally hammered between Rocah and chief solicitor William R. Phelan Jr. calls for major changes in the way the city handles political demonstrations.

The decree only covers protests and protesters – it does not apply to street vendors or performers, or to overnight encampments on city property, such as last year’s Occupy Baltimore camp at McKeldin Square.

End of Onerous Permit System

There are seven key provisions, which will go into effect immediately:

• Any group of under 30 people will no longer need a city permit to protest in any public park.

• For protests over 30 people, a permit will be required from the Department of Recreation and Parks. An application must be made two days in advance, compared to the 30-to-60-day advance notice required in the past.

• The $235 “Demonstration Permit Application Fee” will be waived if the applicant swears that the fee “would inhibit the applicant’s ability to engage in the permitted activity.”

• For the first time ever, the city will grant “instant permits” – waiving the two-day advance notice requirement – if the director of parks determines that the activity “will not reasonably require the commitment of municipal resources or personnel in excess of those which are normally available.” Among those areas eligible for “instant permits” – the War Memorial Plaza in front of City Hall.

• Leafleting by up to 30 people can be conducted without a permit in outdoor spaces of the Inner Harbor that are at least 15 feet away from restaurant dining, the waterside perimeter of the promenade and the amphitheater near Calvert and Pratt streets.

New areas where leafleting will be allowed include McKeldin Square, the grassy area between the World Trade Center and Aquarium, Rash Field, West Shore Fountain Park and around the Kaufman Pavilion.

• Hand-held, battery-operated megaphones will be allowed without the present requirement of a separately-issued city permit.

• The city will prepare a handout summarizing the new rules governing free speech activities. It will display information at the Inner Harbor showing where assembly and leafleting are allowed, and post regulations, permit forms, maps and summaries on a city website.

“Non-Confrontational” Police

The city also pledges to train police officers assigned to the Inner Harbor about the new rules and to provide written “guidance” in the handling of disputes.

The consent decree states that police are to “accommodate” spontaneous demonstrations “whenever possible,” consistent with the need to avoid conflicts with previously permitted activities and “legitimate public safety considerations.”

Potential conflicts should be handled in a “non-confrontational” manner, the decree states, so as not to “restrain or limit First Amendment activities in any of the park areas” of the city.

The settlement ends the lawsuit (Cunningham v. Flowers, JFM-03-1058) between the Women in Black plaintiffs and the Mayor, City Council and the former director of Rec and Parks, Kimberly Flowers.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • BaltimoreDave

    Baltimore and it’s police force have been on the losing end of very expensive suits from ACLU for gross violations of the First Amendment for several years now. It’s a out time they educated our public servants

  • James Hunt

    The good news is, lefties are generally averse to protesting against any of President DroneStrike’s policies, so we’re good ’til at least 2016. (Stay healthy, President 404Care!)

    • ham_snadwich

      I know you have nothing to contribute, but the Women in Black do in fact protest drone strikes.

      • James Hunt

        Thanks for the clarification, snad old boy. I know your protestin’ peeps do manage to rustle up a quorum now and again these days to shake their placards in public, which is why I used the term “generally.” But, c’mon: 200 people rattling around in front of the White House in protest of Syria? The Kurds protesting the Iraqi government drew as many when I was down there a few weeks ago. Where are the ginormous puppet heads of President “Fore!”? When will the kumbaya crowds call the Commander in Chief on his (idiotic) promise to close Guantanamo? The answer, dear snad, is blowin’ in the wind, and the wind says, “Nev-ah!”

        • ham_snadwich

          Well, we can’t compare to the Tea Party. 50 septegenarians lugging around oxygen tanks on their mobility scooters with mispelled signs comparing the current president to either Stalin, Hitler or Mao Tse Tung. Gubmint hands offa mah Medicare!

          • James Hunt

            Snad, my good man: I had no idea you were such an ageist. Ah, well. Young’ns like you are going to be the worst screwed by 404Care.(The juiceboxers at the Daily Kos are already squealing about their premium increases.) Enjoy!

    • flintsparc

      Lefties protest wars by the Obama administration all the time. Most recently, there was a protest against the proposed U.S. intervention in Syria.

  • Lizzie 58

    Now Baltimore City Police can stop wasting their time at the Inner Harbor breaking up peaceful political activities, and the visitor and safety guides at the Waterfront Partnership can stop harassing citizens, who are only expressing their rights under the Constitution. The City better make sure Downtown Partnership and the Waterfront Partnership know the rules. Neither of these property owner organizations are very fond of the free speech rights of others in public places.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • March 24, 2014

    • Last Thursday, I sent an email to the Mayor’s Office of Communications asking for some basic responsiveness: Please return our emailed queries and phone calls about stories. Please send us the same routine emails you send to other members of the media. Lately, more so than usual, they haven’t been. It’s a shame because, even [...]

Twitter

Facebook