Inside City Hall: Lessons from the speed camera mess

How NOT to develop "institutional knowledge" – a look back at a botched program

speed cameras

An inoperative speed camera, turned away from traffic on North Charles Street.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

Today the curtains parted just wide enough for the mayor to tell residents that Baltimore City will pay $600,000 to make its current speed camera vendor go away before the stage lights dimmed and the performance was over.

Asked what went wrong with the contract – and the contractor – whom the mayor publicly lauded a year ago, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake said the agreement hammered out by her legal staff had sealed her lips.

“We can’t discuss that,” she told reporters. “It’s part of the agreement of contract separation” with Brekford Corp., a technology service provider from Anne Arundel County who had wrested the contract away from Xerox State & Local Solutions in November 2012.

Recently we’ve seen the Rawlings-Blake administration seek high-tech (and often very expensive) solutions for rather mundane government responsibilities – “smart” water meters to cure the city’s chronic problems with reading meter dials correctly and “smart” garbage cans to streamline trash collection.

If the city can’t get 72 speed cameras to work, what will happen when it tries to install 400,000 radio-transmitting water meters?

Was to be Operated at No Cost 

The mayor today couched the speed camera mess as a learning experience for her administration, saying, “We are using the institutional knowledge we gained to work on putting out a new RFP [Request for Proposals].”

Before a new RFP is fashioned, the city could learn something from its experience with the last RFP, which seriously misled the public into thinking that the devices were a sure-fire revenue gainer for the city.

The original RFP stated that speed cameras would not cost the taxpayer a dime, with the vendor responsible “to operate and maintain Red Light and Speed Cameras and all other necessary field equipment at all existing locations.”

But almost immediately, unexpected consequences arose from using Brekford, which had grandly promised the city more revenue than its competitors.

First, the old operator, Xerox, yanked its software from the equipment. Then the city got enamored with the idea of new technology – and decided to buy Brekford’s allegedly more accurate speed cameras.

Last April, the mayor and the Board of Estimates agreed to pay $2.2 million for 72 Brekford speed cameras – without grasping that Brekford was struggling to get its software running on the existing cameras.

Indeed, between January and March, the speed camera program was in and out of operation and total city revenues were under $500,000 – far less than the $1.5 million-a-month expected.

Problems with the software – compounded by clerical errors by city personnel assigned to the program – were causing complaints and consternation around the city.

Just six days after the city agreed to pay for the new cameras, the whole program was shut down by City Hall. Ever since, it’s been inoperative as the mayor mulled over her options.

Politics Rears Its Head

By this time, politics had entered into the equation. State legislators, among others, were casting a skeptical eye on the program, which was set up by the state as a safety measure, protecting kids in school zones, not as a sneaky way to rack up revenues from speeders on major roadways.

Faced with various pressures, the mayor and DOT did, or did not, work with Brekford to resolve the technical issues – the city says it did; Brekford’s speed camera director, Maurice R. Nelson, told the Daily Record that he had no contact with the city for months.

That is, not until the city’s lawyers cut a deal. In addition to paying Brekford $600,000 to walk away from the five-year contract, the city will be stuck with $2.2 million of Brekford equipment.

Asked about that equipment today, DOT director William M. Johnson didn’t have much to say. “They have more than one use,” he offered, and could be used for “traffic studies” but indicated that, as of now, his agency doesn’t have a clue about what to do with them.

Rawlings-Blake, meanwhile, indicated that she is seeking a more voter-friendly camera program, eliminating the current “bounty system” in which Brekford would share part of the traffic fees.

No heads have rolled as a result of the botched program. Asked for her takeaway of the speed camera mess, she gave an enigmatic answer: “We had an experience that didn’t work for Baltimore, but, overall, the program works.”

To which she added – “My goal is to get a system that works. . . it’s too important to increase safety” – before exiting stage right to her mayoral office.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • Denise

    “If the city can’t get 72 speed cameras to work, what will happen when it tries to install 400,000 radio-transmitting water meters?”

    I’ll tell you. You end up with a shiny new smart-meter, and no bill for over 6 months. You get BGE staff telling you that there’s no problem, nothing to worry about, and that you have a credit on your account. Then you get a rep that tells you you’ll be billed retroactively for those months, with no apology, and no help. And after all that? You *still*don’t get a bill.

    This kind of FUBAR is a reason people move out of the city. Sigh.

  • Tom Gregory

    Just gotta love the City Hall spin. The speed camera issue explanation rivals “We were victims of our own success” when announcing the welcomed demise of the Grand Prix boondoggle.

  • davethesuave

    i don’t know whether to laugh or cry. I’ve said it before, but IMO it bears repeating: even conceding that Stephanie Rawlings-Blake is a smart woman, at least in the intellectual sense, she is really clueless in the institutional sense. It’s just one plainly stupid decision after another, with no accountability when the train runs off the tracks. But rest assured, gentle readers, Herhonor is surely on the right track when it comes to “moving on up” the career ladder. Can the statehouse be far behind? (Or is that a loose caboose?)

  • Aaron Mirenzi

    man I haven’t heard a group of citizens ever come out in support of these. maybe I’m wrong

  • lanas

    The only reason you PAY to close out a contract is because terminating for cause would show that YOU broke terms of the contract. AKA…the administration couldnt even follow their own f-ed up contract and Brekford knew it. So the admin paid them off to quietly go away. This was literally a $13.5 Million mistake by the admin ($10mill lost revenue, $2.2Mill for cameras, $700k for early 2013 work, $600k to terminate)

  • November 24, 2015

  • November 23, 2015

    • Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake will be off to Paris late next week, leading a delegation of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, of which she is president, to participate in the United Nations convention on climate change. According to information released this afternoon in the Board of Estimates agenda, the mayor will be in Paris from December […]

  • November 20, 2015

    • The Roland Park Place retirement community took a step closer to starting a major renovation and expansion yesterday when the Planning Commission gave “final design approval” to the first phase of the project. Plans by Hord Coplan Macht call for the first phase to include improvements to the existing building and grounds at 830 West […]

  • November 19, 2015

  • November 18, 2015

    • The Board of Estimates temporarily put the brakes on a plan to build a new courtroom and judge’s chambers in the Clarence M. Mitchell Jr. Courthouse after City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young questioned the amount of money it would cost. The spending panel was asked today to approve a request to transfer $1.2 […]

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • December 15, 2014

    •   “Ha ha, so not a surprise.” “Shocking…not!!” We get applause but also the occasional eye-roll these days for our accountability reporting – like last week’s piece about how tax cuts promised by the mayor as a selling point for Horseshoe Baltimore probably won’t happen, thanks to the casino’s lower-than-expected revenues. We get where the […]