Feedback

Rawlings-Blake seeks another $160,000 for speed cameras

Funding request for another consultant on this week's Board of Estimates agenda

inoperative speed camera

Inoperative speed camera on Charles Street in North Baltimore.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

Underscoring her determination to get the suspended speed-camera program up and running, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake wants to spend $160,087.12 on a consultant who will conduct “traffic engineering analyses and reviews” for up to 50 speed and red light cameras.

The administration is requesting the funds from the Board of Estimates, which the mayor controls by virtue of her vote and the votes of two appointees.

The request for funds was disclosed in the panel’s agenda issued today for its Wednesday meeting. The request is on top of $237,185 approved by the board last month to pay URS Corp. to prepare operating procedures for a new camera system.

The program, one of the largest in the country, was put on hold last spring following the disclosure by The Baltimore Sun of hundreds of erroneous tickets issued by Xerox State & Local Solutions – followed by escalating problems with Brekford Corp., the new vendor hired to fix the errors.

After spending $2.2 million on new Brekford cameras last winter, the city terminated its contract with the vendor in December, paying a $600,000 settlement cost. The Brekford equipment is currently in storage at the city Department of Transportation.

Despite repeated waves of controversy and criticism, the mayor has vowed to restart the speed-camera program, saying it is essential for the safety of children.

Century Engineering will conduct “field investigation/evaluations and support services as needed.” The Hunt Valley-based company is on retainer by the city to provide consulting services on road reconstruction and resurfacing projects.

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • Jed Weeks

    Maybe the city should just narrow roadways plagued with constant speeding and dedicate more space to pedestrians, cyclists, and transit. It will slow traffic and improve neighborhoods more than cameras ever will.

    • Andrew

      There is no money in that.

      • Jed Weeks

        There is long-term money in it, but I get what you’re saying.

  • KnowNothingParty

    What has changed with Baltimore roadways since the last time Mayor Failings Blake paid for a “traffic study” to tell her where best to place redlight cameras? How can we, the public, insure we wont be fleeced by her latest incarnation of cameras??? Mayor Failings Blake lied to us about red light camera abuses last time around

  • PhotoRadarscam

    Or, maybe you could use the money to conduct traffic engineering studies at all locations, and evaluate ALL Solutions to improve safety so the best ones can be selected? Permanent and natural compliance can usually be achieved, but of course, it won’t make the city any money, which is all this is about.

    What makes the mayor think that any other cameras will be more accurate?

  • Stanley Goodspeed

    Or how about using that money for more police cameras instead of this useless crap to get more tax $$s…

  • Bonnie Lane

    The mayor could use this to feed or house people or perhaps speed up fixing all the water mains that are breaking all over town.

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • December 15, 2014

    •   “Ha ha, so not a surprise.” “Shocking…not!!” We get applause but also the occasional eye-roll these days for our accountability reporting – like last week’s piece about how tax cuts promised by the mayor as a selling point for Horseshoe Baltimore probably won’t happen, thanks to the casino’s lower-than-expected revenues. We get where the [...]

Twitter

Facebook