Baltimore’s Chief Information Officer, who was escorted out of City Hall earlier this week, denied he was the subject of an investigation regarding “inappropriate contact” with female employees that was halted last September at the highest levels of city government.
“I am unfamiliar with what you are referring to. I certainly have never spent any inappropriate time or done anything that would warrant such an accusation,” L. Jerome Mullen said in an interview yesterday.
Mullen said he was not fired on Tuesday, but had resigned as director of the Mayor’s Office of Information Technology (MOIT) for personal reasons and to pursue future opportunities that would benefit himself and his family.
His statement comes in contrast to the views of several employees (current and former) who said MOIT was immobilized by a “toxic environment” in part because Mullen spent so many hours locked in his office, with lights off, not interacting with or responding to his staff.
“These were pretty serious issues,” said former City Solicitor George Nilson, who confirmed the employees’ accounts of the allegations under investigation.
One of the operational outcomes of Mullen’s alleged lack of attention, the employees said, was MOIT’s failure to properly supervise 911 emergency calls from the public. This resulted in busy signals, dropped calls and frequent wrong addresses to first responders in 2014 and 2015.
Following pressure from the Fire Department and City Council, 911 operations were shifted back to Fire and Police supervision.
Other issues also piled up under Mullen’s watch. The Liquor Board, for example, blamed MOIT for not creating special license software for Horseshoe Casino. This resulted in a $76,000 undercharge to the casino that eventually was fixed.
Mullen disputed these accounts, saying MOIT had “historic issues” that he battled and overcame during his three-year tenure as the agency’s leader. “I’ve done what I think to be a good job to stabilize the environment. I’m very proud of my service to the city,” he said.
Complaints about Mullen’s management style have been bubbling up for more than a year.
A wrongful termination complaint by a fired MOIT employee was reviewed by two members of Nilson’s law department in early 2016, but no formal action was taken.
The Office of Inspector General then got involved when a staffer alleged in an email that in addition to “inappropriate conduct” by Mullen with female employees, computer equipment had disappeared from the office and time sheets were being falsified.
The July email began by saying that MOIT had been “in a state of constant upheaval and turmoil since the departure of Chris Tonjes, the former CIO, and the placement of Mullen in his position.”
It continued: “The content of this email outlines some of the delicate situations that have occurred at MOIT over the past several months, especially within this last Fiscal Year.”
But an odd thing happened to the OIG investigation.
It came to an grinding halt.
On September 13, then-mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake told the media that Robert H. Pearre III, the Inspector General, had resigned. Rawlings-Blake said “personal and family issues” had prompted the inspector general to quit, effective immediately.
Nilson: “Not so Surprised”
Pearre’s previous boss, George Nilson, said he was “actually not so surprised” when he learned that Pearre had left his position.
Nilson had been Baltimore’s City Solicitor, or top lawyer, between 2007 and August 23, 2016. He said he was well aware of Pearre’s investigation of MOIT. “On two separate occasions, Rob Pearre told me he was getting a very unusual amount of pushback from the second floor over his investigation of Mr. Mullen,” Nilson said in an interview this week.
Asked specifically who was “pushing back” on the “second floor” (or the mayor’s office), Nilson said that given that chief of staff Kaliope Parthemos was vacationing in Greece, “that pushback, I’m sure, came from Kim Morton,” the mayor’s deputy chief of staff.
Despite the pushback, Pearre told Nilson was determined to press ahead with the investigation. “It was Rob’s view that the investigation should continue and that it was not reflecting well on Mullen,” Nilson said.
Women in a Dark Office
Nilson described one angle that Pearre was investigating.
“There was the behavior where Mullen was said to come to work at 6 a.m. before anybody else was there and withdraw into his office, in which all the windows were covered in dark material. And there were allegations about women employees in that dark office between 6 and when the rest of the workers showed up at 8:30.”
On August 17, Nilson was notified that he would be relieved of his duties as city solicitor. “Neither the mayor nor any of her staff gave me any reason for my termination other than the presumed reason that is related to the Glen Allen situation” or the law department’s hiring of an attorney with neo-Nazi ties that the mayor reportedly found embarrassing.
Nilson said there were other frictions between himself and the second floor.
“I had previously made it clear to the mayor’s office that the authority to dismiss Rob Pearre, or any inspector general, belonged to the city solicitor. So the mayor and her staff were quite aware of the fact that, if it were desired that Rob Pearre needed to be terminated, that was my decision as long as I was city solicitor.”
Following his dismissal as solicitor, Nilson said, the mayor’s office was free to seek Pearre’s resignation. This it did, he said, under the ruse that it was a matter of personal choice by the inspector general.
“I had a discussion with Rob subsequently,” Nilson explained, “and Rob thought it was probably in his best interest to allow his departure to at least appear to be unrelated to the investigations being conducted by the Office of the Inspector General.”
(With only five agents responsible for rooting out “waste, fraud and abuse” in city government, the OIG is still without a permanent director.)
Avoiding a Potential Scandal
Kim Morton met with Pierre shortly before the mayor made her announcement on September 13, “and sought and obtained his resignation,” Nilson said.
Now an aide to Mayor Catherine Pugh, Morton did not respond to an email request for comment.
Multiple attempts by The Brew to reach Pearre by phone and text messages also failed.
According to a person with deep knowledge of the Mullen case, the Rawlings-Blake administration feared that a public airing of Pearre’s findings would cast the mayor in poor light.
“After all, Mullen would have been the third CIO to turn over in her administration,” the source said. “Unfortunately, R. Pearre was caught in the middle, trying to do his job, which was to investigate and hold city staff accountable.”
Rawlings-Blake has not responded to The Brew‘s queries about the matter.
Mullen’s leadership of the office came on the heels of rapid turnover at MOIT. Rawlings-Blake’s two previous CIOs, Rico Singleton and Christopher Tonjes, were forced out of their positions.
Singleton resigned after an audit revealed that he had set up a job for his girlfriend when he worked for New York State. Tonjes was accused, and later cleared, of financial impropriety. An IT staffing operator, Twyla Garrett, pleaded guilty to misusing Tonjes’ name in emails in an attempt to cover up overbilling MOIT by $165,000.
A high school graduate who had worked at the Pentagon and several small companies, Mullen was hired by Singleton as director of infrastructure in 2011.
Mullen became deputy director of MOIT under Tonjes. After Tonjes left, Mullen lobbied for the top position. In 2014, for example, he touted his abilities to the mayor’s office this way:
“Exceptional organizational, written and oral skills, including dynamic presentation and relationship development capabilities. Strong leadership and team building abilities in addition to effective project management problem solving, and aptitude for emerging technologies. I am currently employed in the Acting CTO [Chief Technology Officer] position and am seeking long-term growth and stability, mission focused and an object oriented opportunity.”
In November 2014, Mullen was appointed MOIT director and Chief Information Officer by Rawlings-Blake.
His appointment caused a stir in some circles because no national search was conducted for the position, which pays $163,000 and – supervising a $25 million yearly budget – is responsible for directing and modernizing IT services in city government.
In a phone interview yesterday, Mullen said he was not aware of any investigation by Inspector General Pearre last summer. He said the law department had looked at a complaint a year ago and “nothing was found.”
He called allegations that he locked himself in his office and interacted inappropriately with female employees false and malicious.
“I can say for sure there is no proof of these allegations,” he said. “It didn’t happen, and it certainly didn’t contribute to why I resigned. . . And you wrote an article about me being fired for poor performance, and that’s not accurate either. I’ve been with the city for five years and there has not been any problem. ”
A New Administration Acts
A different scenario played out for Mullen as the new administration of Mayor Pugh grappled with reports of disarray at MOIT.
The mayor’s office received a letter from Leana Wen, commissioner of the Health Department, saying that Mullen had failed to follow through on the computer needs of her agency. Yet another complaint about Mullen’s personal conduct was filed by an employee, The Brew learned.
By one account, what caused the most annoyance in the Pugh administration was the “Open Baltimore” website administered by MOIT. The site did not include the new mayor’s name and photograph.
Kim Morton recently questioned Mullen and MOIT deputy director, Evette M. Munro, about the omission. “Jerome said he didn’t know about it. That it was done without his knowledge. But City Hall was a little upset,” said one source with knowledge of the matter.
On Tuesday, Morton told Mullen to resign immediately. As he left City Hall, at a hastily-called meeting at MOIT headquarters across Fayette Street, staff was informed that Munro would become the acting CIO and agency director.
SOME OF THE OTHER ALLEGATIONS REPORTED TO THE INSPECTOR GENERAL:
• “Purchase of over half a million of VoIP equipment [by MOIT] to hide transparency of total project cost.”
• “Over $100,000 in taxpayer dollars has been spent for a poor or sometimes non-existent strategic plan [because] Mr. Mullen is unable to define what the agency should do with taxpayer dollars.”
• “The transitions of both 911 and Emergency Dispatch have been handled poorly. Management and staff have been left without knowledge of where they work or what their responsibilities are.”
• “Contractual staff members are allowed to telecommute or just not report to work without warning and have been allowed to do so with pay, although it goes against city policy.”
• “Several staff members[are] not reporting to work as scheduled and reflected on their time sheets.”
• “Around the time of the recent security breach, a cybersecurity employee violated the City’s [substance abuse] policy by tampering with a specimen and failure to remain at the testing site as instructed. Mr. Mullen refused to terminate or discipline in any way this employee due to the employee’s knowledge of an inappropriate relationship.”
JEROME MULLEN’S RESPONSE YESTERDAY:
He told The Brew that he was unaware of an IG investigation and had always acted ethically and in the best interests of the city.
– To reach this reporter: firstname.lastname@example.org