Brew Exclusive: the 18 rec centers the city wants to privatize

A snapshot of a fluid political process as the city's privatization effort moves forward.

lillian jones rec 20111008_0683

The Lillian Jones Rec Center, in Upton, is slated to be turned over to private management by the city.

Photo by: Mark Reutter

The names of the recreation centers the Rawlings-Blake administration hopes to turn over to private operators are a closely guarded secret, but The Brew has obtained the information.

A second RFP (Request for Proposals) on Friday and other information provides a road map of the rec centers pinpointed for private operation.

Consider the list below a snapshot of the administration’s current “wish list,” which is aimed at reducing about $400,000 in operating costs this fiscal year and redirecting city resources to improving and modernizing the remaining rec facilities.

Remember that this list is fluid, subject to the number and quality of proposals that come back on the second round of RFPs – and to future horsetrading among various groups with the mayor’s office and the Recreation and Parks Department.

Privatizing is Hard to Do

Back in August, Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake wanted to pare down the number of rec centers from the current 55 to about 28. That number is proving difficult to achieve from a practical and political standpoint.

The first round of RFPs in October attracted less than 15 proposals – some of which were immediately thrown out by the city.

Meanwhile, the mayor’s plan to transfer rec centers located in school buildings to the school system has not borne fruit. A spokesperson for schools chief Andres A. Alonso told a City Council hearing last month that the schools don’t have the budget or expertise to run rec centers.

Politically, the administration is facing opposition to the closing of any rec centers. A public meeting last Wednesday in which dozens of speakers skewered the city’s plan – and some demanded that it be halted – sent a chill through City Hall.

City Council President Bernard C. “Jack” Young has said that rec centers closings “should not be an option” by the city. He has not taken a stand on private management of some facilities. The mayor retorted by saying that keeping all rec centers open is “not acceptable.”

Several City Council members – feeling the heat of constituents calling their offices – are trying to cut deals in which the rec centers in their districts are not put out to private bid.

Deputy Mayor Kaliope Parthemos is leading the administration’s efforts to work with Council members to keep them “on the reservation” and to point out the positive aspects of the plan, sources told The Brew.

Roosevelt Park and Coldstream Off the List

The Brew has learned, for example, that two facilities originally on the privatization list will be now kept under Rec and Parks management. They are Roosevelt Park in Hampden and Coldstream in Coldstream-Montebello. The Hampden center was the site of a demonstration against privatization two months ago.

Recreation Bureau Chief Bill Tyler said last week that the current way the city operates the rec centers must be changed. There are too many rec centers given current budget realities. What’s more, many centers are inadequately staffed and not providing quality programs to young people.

For example, he said that 15% of the centers have only one full-time staff member, which is not enough for insuring safety, even with adult volunteers running many programs.

Tyler said that plans to modernize more than a dozen rec centers into “model” centers would be a huge step forward for the city. The city has also broken ground for two new “state of the art” rec centers at Clifton Park and Morrell Park.

City budget officials say as many as 10 centers could close if the current RFP process is not successful, although Tyler has pledged to keep all 55 centers open through the fiscal year ending in June.

Rec Centers Subject to Private Bids

The area of the city most impacted by the mayor’s privatization plan is northeast Baltimore, where five centers (Cecil Kirk, Collington Square, Northwood, Oliver and Woodhome) are slated for private operation.

On the other hand, the city seeks to reopen, under private management, two long-closed facilities – the ex-Police League Athletic (PAL) center in West Baltimore and Bocek Rec Center in far East Baltimore.

The following 18 facilities are available to private bidders as part of the city’s RFP process.

No bid has been officially approved yet.

Included are the centers’ street addresses and neighborhoods they serve.

3100 East Madison St.
McElderry Park/Madison-East End
(now closed)

3560 3rd Street
Brooklyn/Curtis Bay

2000 Cecil Ave.
East Baltimore Midway

2621 Winchester St.

1409 N. Collington Ave.
Broadway East/Berea

1601 Madison Ave.
Madison Park/Upton

1530 N. Bentalou St.
Easterwood Park/Penrose/Coppin Heights
(now closed)

2304 Greenmount Ave.
Barclay/Charles Village

2950 Phelps Lane
St. Joseph’s/South Hilton/Irvington

3901 Maine Ave.
Forest Park/Ashburton/Hanlon Park

1310 N. Stricker St.
Upton/Druid Heights/Sandtown-Winchester

1517 Winford Rd.
Loch Raven, Perring Loch, Woodbourne Heights

1600 N. Spring St.
Oliver/Broadway East

2610 Francis St.
Penn North/Reservoir Hill

1201 N. Rosedale St.
Rosemont/Franklintown Road
(now closed)

1044 Leadenhall St.

4100 Towanda Ave.
Park Heights/Towanda Grantley

7310 Moyer Ave.
Overlea/Taylor Heights

Be sure to check our full comment policy before leaving a comment.

  • Ktrueheart

    This delusional DISS-Investment plan is ripe for the comedy stage!  Deputy Mayor Kaliope Parthemos may be able to keep Council members “on the reservation” however, she can’t possibly ”point out the positive aspects of the plan”, because there are NONE!  Let’s just say this strong arm approach from our Mayor is down-right arrogant and NOT supported by US at all!  I pray that NO proposals are submitted for the 2nd RFP, then maybe these bureaucrats will begin listening to US by developing a plan that we can embrace!

  • Erissa72

    I still don’t understand how closing Rec Centers (Privatizing is a misnomer) but then building new state of the art Rec Centers saves the city any money?  I am not buying the “partnership proposal”.  Privatizing means that a free-to-the-public facility is taken from the community and turned into a members only club.  It will be like the YMCA on 33rd having great fees to be a member but not so many programs to make that fee worth while.
    Mr. Tyler is delusional if he truly believes that the residents of this city will pay a membership fee to use Parks and Rec facilities that have always been affordable up to now.

  • Lpurnell2003

    I find that it is a shame the kids have to suffer for the city councils inability to manage the dwindling pot of money we have in the city.

    Why do we still have all these city cars and suv’s that city workers are driving out of state daily? all at the citizens expense? How much do you think that would save by stopping this costly venture?

    If you look at East Baltimore there would be about seven centers closed in the last 2-3 years or more. In the part of the city that incarcerates more youth then any part of the city. It is a shame that the politicians have just been elected because this would truly be a deal breaker for many of them. It is a shame that some were returned in the first place because of the poor representation they have provided the citizens in the prior term or in some cases terms.

    I will be petitioning every year until it is placed on the ballot that there be a two-term limit for all that hold office in Baltimore. I am sick of career politicians that just hold a seat and don’t protect the people that vote them in office. I will be meeting soon with several of the students that have testified at many of the hearing that we had trying to get summer jobs, better education for our kids and now rec. centers for them to safely play and develop while staying out of the juvenile system or adding to the early teen pregnancy list because of nothing constructive to do after school.

    It is clear that this Administration don’t care about our kids so parents you need to wake up raise some HELL while demanding change. It is a sad day in Baltimore as we travel down that road that saw thousands of our kids being arrested and shot or killed because they took the rec. centers away from them.

    This is simply the City that balances the budget on the backs of the youth. What a shame.  

  • Vanella2011

    Maybe with privatization it’ll get the materials the city never supplied. Hopefully working in conjunction with neighborhood organizations can be sure they’ll continue to serve their respective communities.

  • Cindy

    Privitizing public assets while starving local, state, and federal governments is a tactic being used by Third Way Democrats and Republicans towards small government at a time when the public is already losing vital services and resources.  They are starving the governments with a steady drive for lower taxes and constant corporate tax breaks.  With private/public partnertships we see tax money going to private ompanies that cut wages and staff and provide fewer services to maximize profits—–SAY ‘NO’ TO PRIVITIZING PUBLIC ASSETS AND ‘YES’TO TAXING CORPORATIONS AT FAIR RATES!

More of the Daily Drip »

Below the Fold

  • March 24, 2014

    • Last Thursday, I sent an email to the Mayor’s Office of Communications asking for some basic responsiveness: Please return our emailed queries and phone calls about stories. Please send us the same routine emails you send to other members of the media. Lately, more so than usual, they haven’t been. It’s a shame because, even [...]